Autonomous Exploration Based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making and Using D* Lite Algorithm

被引:4
|
作者
Zagradjanin, Novak [1 ]
Pamucar, Dragan [2 ]
Jovanovic, Kosta [1 ]
Knezevic, Nikola [1 ]
Pavkovic, Bojan [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Belgrade, Sch Elect Engn, Belgrade 11120, Serbia
[2] Univ Def, Mil Acad, Dept Logist, Belgrade 11000, Serbia
[3] Mil Tech Inst, Belgrade 11030, Serbia
关键词
Exploration strategies; multi-criteria decision-making; SAW; COPRAS; TOPSIS; STRATEGIES; NAVIGATION; MODEL;
D O I
10.32604/iasc.2022.021979
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
An autonomous robot is often in a situation to perform tasks or missions in an initially unknown environment. A logical approach to doing this implies discovering the environment by the incremental principle defined by the applied exploration strategy. A large number of exploration strategies apply the technique of selecting the next robot position between candidate locations on the frontier between the unknown and the known parts of the environment using the function that combines different criteria. The exploration strategies based on Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM) using the standard SAW, COPRAS and TOPSIS methods are presented in the paper. Their performances are evaluated in terms of the analysis and comparison of the influence that each one of them has on the efficiency of exploration in environments with a different risk level of a "bad choice" in the selection of the next robot position. The simulation results show that, due to its characteristics related to the intention to minimize risk, the application of TOPSIS can provide a good exploration strategy in environments with a high level of considered risk. No significant difference is found in the application of the analyzed MCDM methods in the exploration of environments with a low level of considered risk. Also, the results confirm that MCDM-based exploration strategies achieve better results than strategies when only one criterion is used, regardless of the characteristics of the environment. The famous D* Lite algorithm is used for path planning.
引用
收藏
页码:1369 / 1386
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Consensus among Multi-Criteria Decision-Making methods: Using methods as a voter
    Hocaoglu, M. Fatih
    Tosun, Emre
    JOURNAL OF THE FACULTY OF ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURE OF GAZI UNIVERSITY, 2024, 40 (01): : 103 - 120
  • [22] Ranking Mobile Wallet Service Providers Using Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Approach
    Kapoor, Ashwarya
    Sindwani, Rajiv
    Goel, Manisha
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF E-BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2021, 17 (04) : 19 - 39
  • [23] A fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making model based on lower and upper boundaries
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (07) : 3213 - 3224
  • [24] An α-cut intervals based Fuzzy Best-Worst Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ratandhara, Harshit M.
    Kumar, Mohit
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 159
  • [25] Fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making based on positive and negative extreme solutions
    Wang, Yu-Jie
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2011, 35 (04) : 1994 - 2004
  • [26] Linguistic multi-criteria decision-making with representing semantics by programming
    Yang, Wu-E
    Ma, Chao-Qun
    Han, Zhi-Qiu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS SCIENCE, 2017, 48 (02) : 225 - 235
  • [27] Wastewater Treatment and Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Methods: A Review
    Sharma, Tina
    Kumar, Anuj
    Pant, Sangeeta
    Kotecha, Ketan
    IEEE ACCESS, 2023, 11 : 143704 - 143720
  • [28] Hospital performance management: A multi-criteria decision-making approach
    Tyagi, Aman
    Singh, Preetvanti
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT, 2019, 12 (04) : 286 - 291
  • [29] Exploration strategies based on multi-criteria decision making for searching environments in rescue operations
    Basilico, Nicola
    Amigoni, Francesco
    AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS, 2011, 31 (04) : 401 - 417
  • [30] Exploration strategies based on multi-criteria decision making for searching environments in rescue operations
    Nicola Basilico
    Francesco Amigoni
    Autonomous Robots, 2011, 31 : 401 - 417