Contribution of extended family history in assessment of risk for breast and colon cancer

被引:15
|
作者
Solomon, Benjamin L. [1 ]
Whitman, Todd [2 ]
Wood, Marie E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Med Ctr, 111 Colchester Ave, Burlington, VT 05401 USA
[2] Champlain Valley Phys Hosp, 75 Beekman St, Plattsburgh, NY 12901 USA
来源
BMC FAMILY PRACTICE | 2016年 / 17卷
关键词
Colon cancer; Breast cancer; Family history; Cancer screening; Genetic screening; Cancer risk; Risk assessment; SERVICES TASK-FORCE; COLORECTAL-CANCER; AMERICAN SOCIETY; IDENTIFICATION; VALIDATION; GUIDELINES; STATEMENT; CRITERIA; COLLEGE; CARE;
D O I
10.1186/s12875-016-0521-0
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Family history is important for identifying candidates for high risk cancer screening and referral for genetic counseling. We sought to determine the percentage of individuals who would be eligible for high risk cancer screening or genetic referral and testing if family history includes an extended (vs limited) family history. Methods: Family histories were obtained from 626 women at UVMMC associated mammography centers from 2001 to 2002. ACS guidelines were used to determine eligibility for high risk breast or colon cancer screening. Eligibility for referral for genetic counseling for hereditary breast and colon cancer was determined using the Referral Screening Tool and Amsterdam II screening criteria, respectively. All family histories were assessed for eligibility by a limited history (first degree relatives only) and extended history (first and second degree relatives). Results: Four hundred ninety-nine histories were eligible for review. 18/282 (3.6 %) and 62/123 (12 %) individuals met criteria for high risk breast and colon cancer screening, respectively. 13/18 (72 %) in the high risk breast cancer screening group and 12/62 (19 %) in the high risk colon cancer screening group met criteria based upon an extended family history. 9/282 (1.8 %) and 31/123 (6.2 %) individuals met criteria for genetic counseling referral and testing for breast and colon cancer, respectively. 2/9 (22 %) of individuals in the genetic breast cancer screening group and 21/31 (68 %) individuals in the genetic colon cancer screening group met criteria based upon extended family history. Conclusions: This is one of the first studies to suggest that first degree family history alone is not adequate for identification of candidates for high risk screening and referral for genetic counseling for hereditary breast and colon cancer syndromes. A larger population is needed to further validate this data.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Clinical application of breast cancer risk assessment models
    Ready, Kaylene
    Litton, Jennifer K.
    Arun, Banu K.
    FUTURE ONCOLOGY, 2010, 6 (03) : 355 - 365
  • [32] Family history and risk of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC)
    Anna L. V. Johansson
    Therese M.-L. Andersson
    Chung-Cheng Hsieh
    Sven Cnattingius
    Paul W. Dickman
    Mats Lambe
    Breast Cancer Research and Treatment, 2015, 151 : 209 - 217
  • [33] Breast Cancer: Genetics and Risk Assessment
    Tejada-Berges, Trevor
    CLINICAL OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 59 (04) : 673 - 687
  • [34] Family history and risk of pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC)
    Johansson, Anna L. V.
    Andersson, Therese M. -L.
    Hsieh, Chung-Cheng
    Cnattingius, Sven
    Dickman, Paul W.
    Lambe, Mats
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2015, 151 (01) : 209 - 217
  • [35] Young women with family history of breast cancer and their risk factors for benign breast disease
    Berkey, Catherine S.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Rosner, Bernard
    Frazier, A. Lindsay
    Colditz, Graham A.
    CANCER, 2012, 118 (11) : 2796 - 2803
  • [36] Family History, Mammographic Density, and Risk of Breast Cancer
    Martin, Lisa J.
    Melnichouk, Olga
    Guo, Helen
    Chiarelli, Anna M.
    Hislop, T. Gregory
    Yaffe, Martin J.
    Minkin, Salomon
    Hopper, John L.
    Boyd, Norman F.
    CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2010, 19 (02) : 456 - 463
  • [37] Family history of cancer and risk of breast cancer in the Black Women’s Health Study
    Julie R. Palmer
    Deborah A. Boggs
    Lucile L. Adams-Campbell
    Lynn Rosenberg
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2009, 20 : 1733 - 1737
  • [38] Differences and similarities in breast cancer risk assessment models in clinical practice: which model to choose?
    Jacobi, Catharina E.
    de Bock, Geertruida H.
    Siegerink, Bob
    van Asperen, Christi J.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 115 (02) : 381 - 390
  • [39] Family history of cancer and risk of breast cancer in the Black Women's Health Study
    Palmer, Julie R.
    Boggs, Deborah A.
    Adams-Campbell, Lucile L.
    Rosenberg, Lynn
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2009, 20 (09) : 1733 - 1737
  • [40] Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review
    Lowery, Jan T.
    Ahnen, Dennis J.
    Schroy, Paul C.
    Hampel, Heather
    Baxter, Nancy
    Boland, C. Richard
    Burt, Randall W.
    Butterly, Lynn
    Doerr, Megan
    Doroshenk, Mary
    Feero, W. Gregory
    Henrikson, Nora
    Ladabaum, Uri
    Lieberman, David
    McFarland, Elizabeth G.
    Peterson, Susan K.
    Raymond, Martha
    Samadder, N. Jewel
    Syngal, Sapna
    Weber, Thomas K.
    Zauber, Ann G.
    Smith, Robert
    CANCER, 2016, 122 (17) : 2633 - 2645