"ANTICIPATORY" GOVERNANCE AND NATIONAL SECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT

被引:0
|
作者
Zarochintcev, Sergei, V [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Res Univ Higher Sch Econ, Sch Polit & Governance, 20 Myasnitskaya Str, Moscow 101000, Russia
来源
VOPROSY GOSUDARSTVENNOGO I MUNITSIPALNOGO UPRAVLENIYA-PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION ISSUES | 2021年 / 03期
关键词
anticipatory" governance; adaptive governance; national security; indices and indicators; indicative approach; risks; foresight; deliberative risk ranking method; DELIBERATIVE METHOD; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Complex nature of modern challenges and threats, turbulence of the geopolitical situation, financial, economic and energy crises, along with natural and man-made disasters carry significant risks to the national security of any state. The unexpected intensity of the COVID-19, coupled with other hybrid risks, revealed significant deficiencies in the national security risk assessment (NSRA) system. Issues concerning NSRA are becoming more important in academic literature last 20 years as well as new theories to anticipate possible challenges for better public administration. Academic literature on risk assessment in the context of national security is currently presented in four main clusters. Historically, the first consists of articles in the framework of systematic logical analysis that was formed under the influence of a number of researchers from Carnegie Mellon University who use a deliberative risk ranking method, also called the "Carnegie Mellon risk ranking method". The second part of the approaches to NSRA is based on the verification method of the research which uses mainly quantitative methods (sometimes using a historical approach to forecasting) to assess the components of the national security of the state, including justifying the need to build a technocratic risk assessment system to prevent "state failure". Development of new technologies and innovations has led to the emergence of a research group on the use of anticipatory mechanisms in predicting risks of new innovative technologies. In this case, Anticipatory Governance is described as a system of institutions, rules and norms that allow the use of foresight in order to reduce risks and increase the ability to respond to events at an early rather than later stages of their development. The final part of academic publications consists of very specific articles in the framework of systematic logical analysis of military strategies and other doctrines which by nature of its risks are understood as hybrid, that is, combining artificial and natural origin.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 218
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] National security and the accelerating risk of climate change
    Gunn, Lee
    ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2017, 5
  • [22] Anticipatory governance for social-ecological resilience
    Boyd, Emily
    Nykvist, Bjorn
    Borgstrom, Sara
    Stacewicz, Izabela A.
    AMBIO, 2015, 44 : S149 - S161
  • [23] Information security knowledge sharing in organizations: Investigating the effect of behavioral information security governance and national culture
    Flores, Waldo Rocha
    Antonsen, Egil
    Ekstedt, Mathias
    COMPUTERS & SECURITY, 2014, 43 : 90 - 110
  • [24] Information Security Risk Assessment in SCM
    Roy, Arup
    Gupta, A. D.
    Deshmukh, S. G.
    2013 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM 2013), 2013, : 1002 - 1006
  • [25] Anticipatory governance for newcomers: lessons learned from the UK, the Netherlands, Finland, and Korea
    Heo, Kyungmoo
    Seo, Yongseok
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF FUTURES RESEARCH, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [26] The Analysis of Japan's Energy and Climate Policy from the Aspect of Anticipatory Governance
    Ohta, Hiroshi
    ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (19)
  • [27] Four approaches to anticipatory climate governance: Different conceptions of the future and implications for the present
    Muiderman, Karlijn
    Gupta, Aarti
    Vervoort, Joost
    Biermann, Frank
    WILEY INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEWS-CLIMATE CHANGE, 2020, 11 (06)
  • [28] Effects of sustainable innovation on stakeholder engagement and societal impacts: The mediating role of stakeholder engagement and the moderating role of anticipatory governance
    Chen, Lei
    Qalati, Sikandar Ali
    Fan, Mingyue
    SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2025, 33 (02) : 2406 - 2428
  • [29] Cross-National Governance Research: A Systematic Review and Assessment
    Schiehll, Eduardo
    Martins, Henrique Castro
    CORPORATE GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL REVIEW, 2016, 24 (03) : 181 - 199
  • [30] NATIONAL CYBER SECURITY STRATEGIES: MANAGEMENT, UNIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT
    Stitilis, Darius
    Rotomskis, Irmantas
    Laurinaitis, Marius
    Nadvynychnyy, Sergiy
    Khorunzhak, Nadiya
    INDEPENDENT JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT & PRODUCTION, 2020, 11 (09): : 2341 - 2354