Static and dynamic mechanical properties of the carotid artery from normotensive and hypertensive rats

被引:41
作者
Lichtenstein, O
Safar, ME
Mathieu, E
Poitevin, P
Levy, BI
机构
[1] Hop Lariboisiere, INSERM U141, IFR Circulat, F-75475 Paris, France
[2] Hop Lariboisiere, INSERM U337, IFR Circulat, F-75475 Paris, France
关键词
carotid arteries; stiffness; viscosity; blood pressure;
D O I
10.1161/01.HYP.32.2.346
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Several recent results obtained in hypertensive animals and subjects under in vivo isobaric conditions do not confirm the classic view of stiffer arteries in hypertensive subjects. We compared the mechanical behavior of in situ isolated common carotid arteries from normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats (WKY) and age-matched spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) under both static and dynamic conditions for transmural pressure ranging from 50 to 200 mm Hg, The static pressure (P)-diameter (D) relationship was shifted to higher values of diameters in the SHR mainly because of a larger unstressed carotid diameter (D-o) in hypertensive rats. The carotid mechanical strain, calculated as (D-D-o)/D-o, was significantly reduced in SHR at pressure levels between 100 and 200 mm Hg. The static carotid compliance and distensibility were markedly smaller in SHR than in WKY carotid arteries, indicating a stiffer wall in hypertensive animals. In contrast, carotid compliance and distensibility were similar under dynamic conditions close to the in vivo pulse pressure (frequency, 300 bpm; peak amplitude of the oscillatory pressure, 20 to 25 mm Hg). However, marked differences in dynamic compliance- and distensibility-strain relationships in SHR and WKY are evidence of clearly different arterial wall material properties in bath strains. We therefore conclude that larger lumen carotid arteries in hypertensive rats could compensate for a stiffer arterial wall, resulting in similar dynamic compliance and distensibility in normotensive and hypertensive rats.
引用
收藏
页码:346 / 350
页数:5
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Textbook of Hypertension
[2]  
BAUER R D, 1984, Biorheology, P159
[3]   In vivo in vitro comparison of rat abdominal aorta wall viscosity - Influence of endothelial function [J].
Boutouyrie, P ;
Bezie, Y ;
Lacolley, P ;
Challande, P ;
ChamiotClerc, P ;
Benetos, A ;
delaFaverie, JFR ;
Safar, M ;
Laurent, S .
ARTERIOSCLEROSIS THROMBOSIS AND VASCULAR BIOLOGY, 1997, 17 (07) :1346-1355
[4]  
CAPUTO L, 1992, J HYPERTENS, V10, pS27
[5]  
Fung Y C., 1990, BIOMECHANICS
[6]   ARTERIAL DISTENSIBILITY IN NORMAL AND HYPERTENSIVE MAN [J].
GRIBBIN, B ;
PICKERING, TG ;
SLEIGHT, P .
CLINICAL SCIENCE, 1979, 56 (05) :413-417
[7]   Studies on the elastic properties of human isolated aorta [J].
Hallock, P ;
Benson, IC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 1937, 16 (04) :595-602
[8]   CONDUIT ARTERY COMPLIANCE AND DISTENSIBILITY ARE NOT NECESSARILY REDUCED IN HYPERTENSION [J].
HAYOZ, D ;
RUTSCHMANN, B ;
PERRET, F ;
NIEDERBERGER, M ;
TARDY, Y ;
MOOSER, V ;
NUSSBERGER, J ;
WAEBER, B ;
BRUNNER, HR .
HYPERTENSION, 1992, 20 (01) :1-6
[9]   ASSESSMENT OF THE DISTENSIBILITY OF SUPERFICIAL ARTERIES [J].
HOEKS, APG ;
BRANDS, PJ ;
SMEETS, FAM ;
RENEMAN, RS .
ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 1990, 16 (02) :121-128
[10]   NONINVASIVE ASSESSMENT OF THE AGE-RELATED-CHANGES IN STIFFNESS OF MAJOR BRANCHES OF THE HUMAN ARTERIES [J].
KAWASAKI, T ;
SASAYAMA, S ;
YAGI, S ;
ASAKAWA, T ;
HIRAI, T .
CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH, 1987, 21 (09) :678-687