Investigating the impact of P2P trading on power losses in grid-connected networks with prosumers

被引:75
作者
Azim, M. Imran [1 ]
Tushar, Wayes [1 ]
Saha, Tapan K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Queensland, Brisbane, Qld 4072, Australia
关键词
Peer-to-peer (P2P) trading; Physical layer; Network losses; P2P transaction losses; Grid contributed losses; Non-P2P practice; PEER-TO-PEER; ENERGY MARKETS; INTEGRATION; ALLOCATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.114687
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The extensive financial benefit that a prosumer can reap from participating in P2P trading has been shown to be unprecedented by many recent studies. However, since the actual transfer of electricity occurs over the physical network, a key question that yet to answer is: what is the repercussion of P2P trading on the power losses in grid-connected electricity networks? To this end, this paper presents a detailed physical layer analysis of P2P trading to investigate its impact on the network losses. In this paper, P2P transaction losses is defined as one part of network losses and a strategy is proposed to trace P2P transaction losses using effective nodes' area concept. The other portion of network losses is labelled as grid contributed losses incurred due to the power supplied by the grid to satisfy other customers within and outside effective nodes' area. Finally, this paper utilises IEEE 8500-node distribution test feeder to capture the large-scale performance of P2P trading in comparison with the existing case, in which there is no P2P trading. Several case studies are considered and the first category of simulation results demonstrate that the P2P transactions do not change the network losses, compared to the non-P2P scenario, if prosumers do not have power dispatch flexibility. Further, It is observed from the second category of simulation results that flexible power dispatch of P2P prosumers can change the network losses at some time instants of a typical day. However, the variation in 24 h network losses between P2P and non-P2P cases is found to be insignificant for a large-sized distribution network with notable residential customers for a typical sunny day.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Peer-to-peer energy trading among smart homes [J].
Alam, Muhammad Raisul ;
St-Hilaire, Marc ;
Kunz, Thomas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 238 :1434-1443
[2]   Peer-to-peer-based integrated grid voltage support function for smart photovoltaic inverters [J].
Almasalma, Hamada ;
Claeys, Sander ;
Deconinck, Geert .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 239 :1037-1048
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, FEED IN TARIFF INFOR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, QUEENSL SOL BON SCHE
[5]  
Arritt RF, 2010, 2010 IEEE PES TRANSMISSION AND DISTRIBUTION CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION: SMART SOLUTIONS FOR A CHANGING WORLD
[6]  
Azim M. I., 2019, 2019 IEEE POW EN SOC, P1
[7]   Exogenous Cost Allocation in Peer-to-Peer Electricity Markets [J].
Baroche, Thomas ;
Pinson, Pierre ;
Latimier, Roman Le Goff ;
Ben Ahmed, Hamid .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (04) :2553-2564
[8]   Trading strategy optimization for a prosumer in continuous double auction based peer-to-peer market: A prediction-integration model [J].
Chen, Kaixuan ;
Lin, Jin ;
Song, Yonghua .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 242 :1121-1133
[9]   Dispersed Generation Enable Loss Reduction and Voltage Profile Improvement in Distribution Network-Case Study, Gujarat, India [J].
Davda, Akash T. ;
Azzopardi, Brian ;
Parekh, Bhupendra R. ;
Desai, Manhar D. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON POWER SYSTEMS, 2014, 29 (03) :1242-1249
[10]   A Technical Approach to the Energy Blockchain in Microgrids [J].
Di Silvestre, Maria Luisa ;
Gallo, Pierluigi ;
Ippolito, Mariano Giuseppe ;
Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva ;
Zizzo, Gaetano .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INDUSTRIAL INFORMATICS, 2018, 14 (11) :4792-4803