Topramezone: A selective post-emergence herbicide in chickpea for higher weed control efficiency and crop productivity

被引:13
作者
Nath, C. P. [1 ]
Kumar, Narendra [1 ]
Hazra, K. K. [1 ]
Praharaj, C. S. [1 ]
Singh, S. S. [2 ]
Dubey, R. P. [3 ]
Sharma, A. R. [2 ]
机构
[1] ICAR Indian Inst Pulses Res, Kanpur 208024, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] Rani Lakshmi Bai Cent Agr Univ, Jhansi 284003, Uttar Pradesh, India
[3] ICAR Directorate Weed Res, Jabalpur 482004, Madhya Pradesh, India
关键词
Phyototoxicity; Selectivity; Weed flora; Weed control efficiency; Yield loss; FENOXAPROP-P-ETHYL; CICER-ARIETINUM; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; POST; SOIL; IMAZETHAPYR; RESISTANCE; TOLERANCE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.cropro.2021.105814
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is a dominant pulse crop in the world for its climate resilience and nutritional values. Weed infestation causes a significant yield loss in chickpea and jeopardize in realizing the potential yield across regions. Pendimethalin as pre-emergence (PRE) is the ruling herbicide, however, post-emergence (POST) herbicides are limited in this crop particularly for managing broad-leaved weeds and higher yield gain. We assessed the impact of POST herbicides available in different crops on weed phytotoxicity, crop selectivity and yield performance in chickpea on sandy-loam soil of Kanpur, India. The experiment was undertaken for two consecutive years (2016-17 and 2017-18) comprising nine herbicides, besides unweeded control (UWC) and weed-free check (WFC). Among the herbicides tested, halosulfuron-methyl 70 g a.i. ha(-1) and tembotrione 100 g a.i. ha(-1) showed the maximum phytotoxicity scale of 5-10 on chickpea. Clodinafop-propargyl + sodium-acifluorfen 122.5 g a.i. ha(-1) and imazethapyr + imazamox 70 g a.i. ha(-1) had a recoverable phytotoxicity (scale 3-5) on chickpea. Topramezone 20.6 g a.i. ha(-1) at 25 days after sowing (DAS) resulted in higher phytotoxicity on weeds (toxicity scale of 7-10) without any phytotoxicity on chickpea. It significantly controlled the dominant broad-leaved weeds: Chenopodium album L., Lepidium didymum L., Spergula arvensis L., Medicago polymorpha L. and Fumaria parviflora Lam. compared to the remaining herbicides. Topramezone reduced total weed density by 68-70% and 48-51% (P = 0.05) at 45 and 95 DAS compared with UWC, respectively. Therefore, this herbicide had higher (P = 0.05) weed control efficiency in both years (89.8% in 2016-17 and 76.5% in 2017-18) than remaining treatments. Topramezone increased 15.3-19.6% chickpea seed yield than the recommended herbicide pendimethalin 1000 g a.i. ha(-1) - quizalofop-p-ethyl 100 g a.i. ha(-1) without affecting the nodulation and fluorescein diacetate activity. The UWC resulted in 64% (mean of two years) yield loss compared to the WFC in chickpea. Importantly, topramezone gave comparable yield with WFC. Hence, topramezone can be safely used in chickpea for managing broad-leaved weeds and realizing higher productivity.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
[21]   Detection of the herbicide fenoxaprop-P-ethyl, its agronomic safener isoxadifen ethyl and their metabolites residue in rice [J].
Lucini, Luigi ;
Molinari, Gian Pietro .
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND SAFETY OF CROPS & FOODS, 2011, 3 (02) :63-68
[22]   Economic importance of chickpea: Production, value, and world trade [J].
Merga, Bulti ;
Haji, Jema .
COGENT FOOD & AGRICULTURE, 2019, 5 (01)
[23]  
Muhammad Ansar Muhammad Ansar, 2010, Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, V16, P421
[24]   Response of Soybean to Halosulfuron Herbicide [J].
Nandula, V. K. ;
Poston, D. H. ;
Reddy, K. N. ;
Whiting, K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2009, 2009
[25]  
Nath CP, 2015, INDIAN J AGRON, V60, P554
[26]   Evaluation of New Generation Post-emergence Herbicides in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) [J].
Nath, C. P. ;
Dubey, R. P. ;
Sharma, A. R. ;
Hazra, K. K. ;
Kumar, Narendra ;
Singh, S. S. .
NATIONAL ACADEMY SCIENCE LETTERS-INDIA, 2018, 41 (01) :1-5
[27]   Recurrent selection with reduced herbicide rates results in the rapid evolution of herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum [J].
Neve, P ;
Powles, S .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 2005, 110 (06) :1154-1166
[28]  
Niranjan I.K., INT J AGR APPL SCI, V1, P87
[29]  
Noor Muhammad Noor Muhammad, 2011, Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, V17, P17
[30]  
Nyanga P. H., 2012, Journal of Food Research, V1, P120