Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group

被引:55
作者
Fleming, G. Alexander [1 ]
Petrie, John R. [2 ]
Bergenstal, Richard M. [3 ]
Holl, Reinhard W. [4 ]
Peters, Anne L. [5 ]
Heinemann, Lutz [6 ]
机构
[1] Kinexum, POB 1260, Harpers Ferry, WV 25425 USA
[2] Univ Glasgow, Inst Cardiovasc & Med Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Int Diabet Ctr, Pk Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN USA
[4] Univ Ulm, Inst Epidemiol & Med Biometry, ZIBMT, Ulm, Germany
[5] Univ Southern Calif, Keck Sch Med, Los Angeles, CA 90007 USA
[6] Sci Consulting Diabet GmbH, Neuss, Germany
关键词
CE mark; Diabetes therapy; Digital apps; Digital health technology; Medical devices; Regulatory agencies; Smartphones; SELF-MANAGEMENT; MOBILE APPS; INTERVENTION; GLUCOSE; PREVENT; DEVICES;
D O I
10.1007/s00125-019-05034-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ('apps'), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardise how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organisations. We found that, across the USA and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organisations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and WHO, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policymakers, professional organisations, researchers, people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardisation, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 241
页数:13
相关论文
共 80 条
  • [1] AADE7™ self-care behaviors
    不详
    [J]. DIABETES EDUCATOR, 2008, 34 (03) : 445 - 449
  • [2] [Anonymous], MOB MED APPL
  • [3] [Anonymous], Number of mHealth apps available in the Google Play Store from 1st quarter 2015 to 3rd quarter 2022
  • [4] [Anonymous], Use of Real-World Evidence to Support Regulatory Decision-Making for Medical Devices - Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff
  • [5] [Anonymous], Google Fit
  • [6] [Anonymous], Digital Health Software Precertification (PreCert) Pi lot Program
  • [7] [Anonymous], National Evaluation System for Health Technology (NEST)
  • [8] *APPL, HEALTH
  • [9] Mobile Applications for Diabetics: A Systematic Review and Expert-Based Usability Evaluation Considering the Special Requirements of Diabetes Patients Age 50 Years or Older
    Arnhold, Madlen
    Quade, Mandy
    Kirch, Wilhelm
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2014, 16 (04) : 34 - 51
  • [10] *BANKM, MAN PHON AR THER WOR