Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Cisplatin and Gemcitabine Followed by Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial

被引:83
作者
da Costa, Samantha Cabral S. [1 ]
Bonadio, Renata Colombo [1 ]
Gabrielli, Flavia Carolina G. [1 ]
Aranha, Andrea S. [1 ]
Dias Genta, Maria Luiza N. [1 ]
Miranda, Vanessa C. [1 ]
de Freitas, Daniela [1 ]
Abdo Filho, Elias [1 ]
Ferreira, Patricia A. O. [1 ]
Machado, Karime K. [2 ]
Scaranti, Mariana [1 ]
Carvalho, Heloisa de A. [1 ]
Estevez-Diz, Maria Del Pilar [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
[2] Hosp Sirio Libanes, Brasilia, DF, Brazil
关键词
CONCURRENT CISPLATIN; PELVIC RADIATION; CARCINOMA; SURVIVAL; RADIOTHERAPY;
D O I
10.1200/JCO.19.00674
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE Although chemoradiation therapy (CRT) with cisplatin remains the standard treatment of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), 40% of patients present with disease recurrence. Additional treatment strategies are required to improve outcomes. We conducted a trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by CRT. METHODS In this phase II trial, patients with LACC (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIB to IVA or with positive lymph nodes) were randomly assigned to three cycles of NAC with cisplatin and gemcitabine followed by standard CRT with weekly cisplatin plus pelvic radiotherapy or to standard CRT alone. The primary end point was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points were response rate, 3-year locoregional control, 3-year overall survival (OS), safety, and quality of life. RESULTS From 107 patients enrolled in the trial, 55 were randomly assigned to the NAC arm and 52 to the CRT-alone arm. The majority of patients had squamous cell carcinoma (87.8%). After a median follow-up of 31.7 months, NAC was associated with an inferior PFS, with 3-year PFS rates of 40.9% v 60.4% in the CRT arm (hazard ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.26; P = .033). NAC also was associated with a lower OS (3-year OS rate, 60.7% v 86.8%; hazard ratio, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.29 to 6.01; P = .006). After treatment completion, complete response rates were 56.3% in the NAC arm and 80.3% in the CRT arm (P = .008). Toxicities were similar in both arms, with the exception of hypomagnesemia and neuropathy being more common with NAC. CONCLUSION This study shows that the addition of NAC consisting of cisplatin and gemcitabine to standard CRT is not superior and is possibly inferior to CRT alone for the treatment of LACC. (C) 2019 by American Society of Clinical Oncology
引用
收藏
页码:3124 / +
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation in locally advanced cervical cancer
    Alexandre Silva de Azevedo, Carla Rameri
    Santos Thuler, Luiz Claudio
    Gonsalves de Mello, Maria Julia
    de Oliveira Lima, Jurema Telles
    Fassizoli da Fonte, Ana Luiza
    Santos Fontao, Diogenes Fernando
    Gomes Carneiro, Vandre Cabral
    Cabral Chang, Tien Man
    Ferreira, Carlos Gil
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2017, 146 (03) : 560 - 565
  • [2] [Anonymous], JCO CLIN CANC INFORM
  • [3] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer:: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 21 randomised trials
    Benedetti-Panici, P
    Bermudez, A
    Blake, P
    Cárdenas, J
    Chang, TC
    Chiara, S
    Di Paola, G
    Floquet, A
    Guthrie, D
    Kigawa, J
    Kumar, L
    Leborgne, F
    Lodge, N
    Poole, C
    Sardi, J
    Souhami, L
    Sundfor, K
    Symonds, P
    Tattersall, M
    Greggi, S
    Guthrie, D
    Parker, V
    Parmar, MKB
    Sardi, J
    Stewart, LA
    Tierney, JF
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 39 (17) : 2470 - 2486
  • [4] Brazil's Challenges and Opportunities
    de Moraes, Fabio Ynoe
    Marta, Gustavo Nader
    Hanna, Samir Abdallah
    Teixeira Leite, Elton Trigo
    Ferrigno, Robson
    da Silva, Joao Luis Fernandes
    Carvalho, Heloisa de Andrade
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2015, 92 (04): : 707 - 712
  • [5] Modulation of radiation-induced strand break repair by cisplatin in mammalian cells
    Dolling, JA
    Boreham, DR
    Brown, DL
    Mitchel, REJ
    Raaphorst, GP
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 74 (01) : 61 - 69
  • [6] Phase III, Open-Label, Randomized Study Comparing Concurrent Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin and Radiation Followed by Adjuvant Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Versus Concurrent Cisplatin and Radiation in Patients With Stage IIB to IVA Carcinoma of the Cervix
    Duenas-Gonzalez, Alfonso
    Zarba, Juan J.
    Patel, Firuza
    Alcedo, Juan C.
    Beslija, Semir
    Casanova, Luis
    Pattaranutaporn, Pittayapoom
    Hameed, Shahid
    Blair, Julie M.
    Barraclough, Helen
    Orlando, Mauro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (13) : 1678 - 1685
  • [7] Edge S.B., 2010, AJCC cancer staging manual, V649
  • [8] Commentary: Induction chemotherapy for head and neck cancer: Hypothesis-based rather than evidence-based medicine
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    [J]. ONCOLOGIST, 2007, 12 (08) : 975 - 977
  • [9] Accelerated regrowth of non-small-cell lung tumours after induction chemotherapy
    El Sharouni, SY
    Kal, HB
    Battermann, JJ
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2003, 89 (12) : 2184 - 2189
  • [10] Fayers P, 2001, EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual