Two Senses of "Wei (sic)": A New Interpretation of Xunzi's Theory of Human Nature

被引:6
作者
Fung Yiu-ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Univ Sci & Technol, Div Humanities, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
DAO-A JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY | 2012年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
xing (sic)" (nature); wei (sic)" (artifice); zhi (sic)" (knowing); neng (sic)" (capacity or ability);
D O I
10.1007/s11712-012-9268-z
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
In contrast to the traditional and ordinary interpretation of Xunzi's theory of human nature, which considers Xunzi's theory as claiming that human nature is bad or evil, this article aims at, first, arguing that the interpretation is wrong or at least incomplete and, second, constructing a new interpretation that, according to Xunzi's text, there are some factors in human nature that are able to promote good behaviors. I shall demonstrate that some major paragraphs in Xunzi's text were misinterpreted and misarranged, analyze that the word (artifice) in the chapter of "Zhengming" has two different but related senses, one of which designates some of the potential capacities of human nature, and argue that the 23 words in the chapter of "Rongru" should not be deleted as redundant, as was done by the two famous philologists in Qing dynasdy, W Niansun and W Xianqian.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 200
页数:14
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Chen Daqi, 1954, XUNZIS THOUGHT
[2]  
Cua AntonioS., 2005, HUMAN NATURE RITUAL
[3]  
Fu Sinian, 1940, CRITICAL EXAMINATION
[4]  
Fung Yiu-ming, 1992, CHINESE PHILOS ANCIE
[5]  
Fung Yiu-ming, 2005, NCCU PHILOS J, V14, P169
[6]  
Fung Yu-lanDerk Bodde., 1952, HIST CHINESE PHILOS
[7]  
Graham AngusC., 1967, TSING HUA J CHINESE, V6, P215
[8]  
Hu Shi, 1970, OUTLINE HIST CHINESE, V1
[9]  
Knoblock John, 1999, LIB CHINESE CLASSICS
[10]  
Li Ling, 2002, READING NOTES GUODIA