Visions for India: public participation, debate and the S&T community

被引:2
作者
Sekhsaria, Pankaj [1 ]
Thayyil, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, DST Ctr Policy Res, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, New Delhi 110016, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 113卷 / 10期
关键词
Technology visions; technology assessment; visioning exercise; CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; INNOVATION POLICY 2013; SCIENCE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v113/i10/1835-1840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This article is an exploration into the nature, width and scope of science and technology visioning exercises in India, particularly in the context of how these narratives are presented and discussed in Current Science, one of India's premier science journals. We categorize these visions into two broad categories - one is a vision that is more individual and/or domain-specific; the other is the institutionalized vision that has a larger mandate and canvas and that creates imaginaries of the future and/or provides horizons for society and S&T to move towards. Prominent examples of the latter are India's Technology Vision 2020 and the most recent, Technology Vision 2035. We observe that visioning exercises in the country have been and continue to be taken up quite prominently, but narratives and debates around them are present only marginally in Current Science. We discuss possible reasons for this and conclude with the hope that more attention will be paid to such exercises and documents on the accounts of investments that are made in them, on the implications these visions have and the importance of imaginaries of the future they create for society, country and for S&T.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1840
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [31] Beyond traditional stakeholder engagement: Public participation roles in California's statewide marine protected area planning process
    Sayce, Kelly
    Shuman, Craig
    Connor, Darci
    Reisewitz, Annie
    Pope, Elizabeth
    Miller-Henson, Melissa
    Poncelet, Eric
    Monie, Dominique
    Owens, Brian
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 74 : 57 - 66
  • [32] Transdisciplinarity of India's master's level public health programmes: evidence from admission criteria of the programmes offered since 1995
    Ilangovan, Kumaravel
    Muthappan, Sendhilkumar
    Govindarajan, Keerthiga
    Vairamani, Vignesh
    Venkatasamy, Vettrichelvan
    Ponnaiah, Manickam
    HUMAN RESOURCES FOR HEALTH, 2022, 20 (01)
  • [33] Who Doesn't Trust Fauci? The Public's Belief in the Expertise and Shared Values of Scientists in the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Evans, John H.
    Hargittai, Eszter
    SOCIUS, 2020, 6
  • [34] WOMEN'S PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC RESEARCH ORGANISATIONS IN ARGENTINA: EVALUATION MECHANISMS IN THE COMISION NACIONAL DE ENERGIA ATOMICA (CNEA) AND INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE TECNOLOGIA AGROPECUARIA (INTA)
    Rial, Mariana
    Azcurra, Karen
    Ferpozzi, Hugo
    ARBOR-CIENCIA PENSAMIENTO Y CULTURA, 2021, 197 (801)
  • [35] A mixed-methods community-based participatory research to explore stakeholder's perspectives and to quantify the effect of crop residue burning on air and human health in Central India: study protocol
    Trushna, Tanwi
    Diwan, Vishal
    Nandi, Subroto Shambhu
    Aher, Satish Bhagwatrao
    Tiwari, Rajnarayan R.
    Sabde, Yogesh Damodar
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [36] "Don't smoke in public, you look like trash": An exploratory study about women's experiences of smoking-related stigmatisation and the connection to neighbourhood-level deprivation
    McCready, Genevieve
    Glenn, Nicole M.
    Frohlich, Katherine L.
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2019, 58