Visions for India: public participation, debate and the S&T community

被引:2
作者
Sekhsaria, Pankaj [1 ]
Thayyil, Naveen [1 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Delhi, DST Ctr Policy Res, Dept Humanities & Social Sci, New Delhi 110016, India
来源
CURRENT SCIENCE | 2017年 / 113卷 / 10期
关键词
Technology visions; technology assessment; visioning exercise; CONSTRUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY-ASSESSMENT; INNOVATION POLICY 2013; SCIENCE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; AGRICULTURE;
D O I
10.18520/cs/v113/i10/1835-1840
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This article is an exploration into the nature, width and scope of science and technology visioning exercises in India, particularly in the context of how these narratives are presented and discussed in Current Science, one of India's premier science journals. We categorize these visions into two broad categories - one is a vision that is more individual and/or domain-specific; the other is the institutionalized vision that has a larger mandate and canvas and that creates imaginaries of the future and/or provides horizons for society and S&T to move towards. Prominent examples of the latter are India's Technology Vision 2020 and the most recent, Technology Vision 2035. We observe that visioning exercises in the country have been and continue to be taken up quite prominently, but narratives and debates around them are present only marginally in Current Science. We discuss possible reasons for this and conclude with the hope that more attention will be paid to such exercises and documents on the accounts of investments that are made in them, on the implications these visions have and the importance of imaginaries of the future they create for society, country and for S&T.
引用
收藏
页码:1835 / 1840
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [2] S&T indicators as a tool for formative evaluation of research programs
    Lepori, Benedetto
    Reale, Emanuela
    EVALUATION, 2012, 18 (04) : 451 - 465
  • [3] Innovation Systems and Policy Instruments: The Application of S&T Indicators
    Ho, Tay-Yeu
    Tseng, Yung-Ching
    Hung, Shih-Chang
    2014 PORTLAND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY (PICMET), 2014, : 386 - 397
  • [4] Priorities for future innovation: Russian S&T Foresight 2030
    Sokolov, Alexander
    Chulok, Alexander
    FUTURES, 2016, 80 : 17 - 32
  • [5] Visions of Public Space: Reproducing and Resisting Social Hierarchies in a Community Garden
    Aptekar, Sofya
    SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 2015, 30 (01) : 209 - 227
  • [6] Role of bilateral institution in influencing collaboration: case study of CEFIPRA-a bilateral S&T institution established by India and France
    Bhattacharya, Sujit
    Kaul, Arshia
    Shilpa
    Sharma, Praveen
    SCIENTOMETRICS, 2015, 102 (01) : 169 - 194
  • [7] Raising the bar for Indian S&T journals: some contentions revisited
    Mahesh, G.
    CURRENT SCIENCE, 2021, 121 (05): : 618 - 621
  • [8] Community forestry in British Columbia: Policy progression and public participation
    Furness, Ella
    Harshaw, Howard
    Nelson, Harry
    FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2015, 58 : 85 - 91
  • [9] Observable and unobservable causes of the gender gap in S&T funding for young researchers
    Suarez, Diana
    Fiorentin, Florencia
    Pereira, Mariano
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (04) : 579 - 590
  • [10] The GM Crop Debate in India: Stakeholders' Interests, Perceptions, Trust and Public Policy
    Kanaujia, Anurag
    Bhattacharya, Sujit
    ASIAN BIOTECHNOLOGY AND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW, 2018, 20 (1-2): : 27 - 45