Validation of a deep learning-based material estimation model for Monte Carlo dose calculation in proton therapy

被引:19
作者
Chang, Chih-Wei [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Shuang [3 ]
Gao, Yuan [1 ,2 ]
Lin, Liyong [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Tian [4 ]
Bradley, Jeffrey D. [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Tiezhi [3 ]
Zhou, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Xiaofeng [1 ,2 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[3] Washington Univ, Phys Div, Dept Radiat Oncol, Sch Med, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] Mt Sinai Med Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, New York, NY 10029 USA
[5] Emory Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
[6] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30308 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
deep learning validation; physics-informed deep learning; proton therapy; Monte Carlo dose calculation; DECT material estimation; DUAL-ENERGY CT; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; RANGE UNCERTAINTIES; BEAM; VERIFICATION; RADIOGRAPHY; CALIBRATION; PARAMETERS; CARBON;
D O I
10.1088/1361-6560/ac9663
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective. Computed tomography (CT) to material property conversion dominates proton range uncertainty, impacting the quality of proton treatment planning. Physics-based and machine learning-based methods have been investigated to leverage dual-energy CT (DECT) to predict proton ranges. Recent development includes physics-informed deep learning (DL) for material property inference. This paper aims to develop a framework to validate Monte Carlo dose calculation (MCDC) using CT-based material characterization models. Approach. The proposed framework includes two experiments to validate in vivo dose and water equivalent thickness (WET) distributions using anthropomorphic and porcine phantoms. Phantoms were irradiated using anteroposterior proton beams, and the exit doses and residual ranges were measured by MatriXX PT and a multi-layer strip ionization chamber. Two pre-trained conventional and physics-informed residual networks (RN/PRN) were used for mass density inference from DECT. Additional two heuristic material conversion models using single-energy CT (SECT) and DECT were implemented for comparisons. The gamma index was used for dose comparisons with criteria of 3%/3 mm (10% dose threshold). Main results. The phantom study showed that MCDC with PRN achieved mean gamma passing rates of 95.9% and 97.8% for the anthropomorphic and porcine phantoms. The rates were 86.0% and 79.7% for MCDC with the empirical DECT model. WET analyses indicated that the mean WET variations between measurement and simulation were -1.66 mm, -2.48 mm, and -0.06 mm for MCDC using a Hounsfield look-up table with SECT and empirical and PRN models with DECT. Validation experiments indicated that MCDC with PRN achieved consistent dose and WET distributions with measurement. Significance. The proposed framework can be used to identify the optimal CT-based material characterization model for MCDC to improve proton range uncertainty. The framework can systematically verify the accuracy of proton treatment planning, and it can potentially be implemented in the treatment room to be instrumental in online adaptive treatment planning.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] Dual-energy CT quantitative imaging: a comparison study between twin-beam and dual-source CT scanners
    Almeida, Isabel P.
    Schyns, Lotte E. J. R.
    Ollers, Michel C.
    van Elmpt, Wouter
    Parodi, Katia
    Landry, Guillaume
    Verhaegen, Frank
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2017, 44 (01) : 171 - 179
  • [2] Verification of patient-specific dose distributions in proton therapy using a commercial two-dimensional ion chamber array
    Arjomandy, Bijan
    Sahoo, Narayan
    Ciangaru, George
    Zhu, Ronald
    Song, Xiaofei
    Gillin, Michael
    [J]. MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2010, 37 (11) : 5831 - 5837
  • [3] Solving inverse problems using data-driven models
    Arridge, Simon
    Maass, Peter
    Oktem, Ozan
    Schonlieb, Carola-Bibiane
    [J]. ACTA NUMERICA, 2019, 28 : 1 - 174
  • [4] Radiation oncology in the era of precision medicine
    Baumann, Michael
    Krause, Mechthild
    Overgaard, Jens
    Debus, Juergen
    Bentzen, Soren M.
    Daartz, Juliane
    Richter, Christian
    Zips, Daniel
    Bortfeld, Thomas
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS CANCER, 2016, 16 (04) : 234 - 249
  • [5] OCCAM RAZOR
    BLUMER, A
    EHRENFEUCHT, A
    HAUSSLER, D
    WARMUTH, MK
    [J]. INFORMATION PROCESSING LETTERS, 1987, 24 (06) : 377 - 380
  • [6] A stoichiometric calibration method for dual energy computed tomography
    Bourque, Alexandra E.
    Carrier, Jean-Francois
    Bouchard, Hugo
    [J]. PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2014, 59 (08) : 2059 - 2088
  • [7] Data-driven discovery of coordinates and governing equations
    Champion, Kathleen
    Lusch, Bethany
    Kutz, J. Nathan
    Brunton, Steven L.
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2019, 116 (45) : 22445 - 22451
  • [8] Chang CW, 2022, Arxiv, DOI arXiv:2207.13150
  • [9] Using Neural Network to Enhance Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Parametric Mapping for Proton Therapy
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Gao, Yuan
    Wang, Qian
    Lei, Yang
    Wang, Tonghe
    Zhou, Jun
    Lin, Liyong
    Bradley, Jeffrey D.
    Liu, Tian
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: PHYSICS OF MEDICAL IMAGING, 2022, 12031
  • [10] An unsupervised patient-specific metal artifact reduction framework for proton therapy
    Chang, Chih-Wei
    Lei, Yang
    Charyyev, Serdar
    Leng, Shuai
    Yoon, Tim
    Zhou, Jun
    Yang, Xiaofeng
    Lin, Liyong
    [J]. MEDICAL IMAGING 2022: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2022, 12034