The Pressman-Wildavsky Paradox: Four Addenda or Why Models Based on Probability Theory Can Predict Implementation Success and Suggest Useful Tactical Advice for Implementers (Reprinted from Journal of Public Policy, vol 2, pg 1-22, 1982)

被引:0
作者
Bowen, Elinor R. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Polit Sci, Chicago, IL 60607 USA
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Pressman and Wildavsky's Implementation occupies center stage in the developing literature about policy implementation, in part because of the analogy they drew between implementation processes and the multiplicative model from probability theory. This paper takes the relevance of probability theory further and considers the additive model from probability theory and conditional probabilities as well as the multiplicative model. This expanded coverage of probability theorems (i) leads to markedly increased optimism about the likelihood of successful implementation, (2) encompasses empirically reasonable tactics such as persistence, packaging of clearances, engineering bandwagons and policy reduction, and (3) generates advice to hopeful implementers - some of it non-obvious.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 261
页数:21
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Implementation
[2]  
Bailey Stephen Kemp, 1968, ESEA: The Office ofEducation Administers a Law
[3]  
Bardach Eugene., 1977, IMPLEMENTATION GAME
[4]  
Blalock Hubert., 1979, Social Statistics
[5]  
Blau P.M., 1962, FORMAL ORG
[6]  
Bowen Elinor., 1982, J PUBLIC POLICY, V2, P1
[7]  
Cohen MD, 1974, LEADERSHIP AMBIGUITY
[8]  
Derthick Martha., 1972, New Towns In-Town
[9]  
GROSS, 1971, Implementing organizational innovations. A sociological analysis of planned educational change
[10]  
Kaufman H., 1960, FOREST RANGER