Focusing on the Formative: Building an Assessment System Aimed at Student Growth and Development

被引:78
作者
Konopasek, Lyuba [1 ,2 ]
Norcini, John [3 ]
Krupat, Edward [4 ]
机构
[1] NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Box 312,525 E 68th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Weill Cornell Med, Pediat, New York, NY USA
[3] Fdn Adv Int Med Educ & Res, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Ctr Evaluat, Boston, MA USA
关键词
ENTRUSTABLE PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES; UNDERGRADUATE MEDICAL-EDUCATION; CLINICAL-EVALUATION EXERCISE; ACCREDITATION SYSTEM; DELIBERATE PRACTICE; EFFECTIVE FEEDBACK; SELF-ASSESSMENT; NATIONAL-SURVEY; MODEL; CLERKSHIPS;
D O I
10.1097/ACM.0000000000001171
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This Perspective addresses the need for an integrated system of formative and summative assessment in undergraduate medical education with a focus on the formative. While acknowledging the importance of summative assessment, which asks whether trainees have met criteria for progression, the authors propose that a formatively focused assessment system can best accomplish a central task of competency-based medical education: transmitting feedback to learners in a format and a manner that will help them to improve, develop, and grow. Formative assessment should not be seen as a set of singular events but, rather, as a process that is organized and integrated over time, much like the cycle of quality improvement in medicine. To justify this position, the authors discuss its conceptual underpinnings and rationale, including the need to prepare learners for the formatively focused assessment system of graduate medical education. Next, the authors identify assessment strategies that could be employed, as well as the characteristics of an institutional culture and the learner-teacher relationship necessary for a learner-centered, improvement-focused assessment system to succeed. Finally, an infrastructure for such a system is proposed. This consists of a foundation of well-articulated and disseminated milestones for achievement and four pillars: faculty development, learner development, longitudinal academic advising and coaching, and documentation of developing competence. The authors conclude by suggesting that the guidelines proposed are analogous to the principles of continuity and coordination of care, so much valued in the world of medicine yet often overlooked in the world of education.
引用
收藏
页码:1492 / 1497
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Algiraigri AH, 2014, MED ED ONLINE, P19
[2]  
Andolsek K., 2015, Clinical Competency Committees. A guidebook for programs
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, SELF THEORIES THEIR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The Core Entrustable Professional Activities for Entering Residency
[5]   State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback [J].
Archer, Julian C. .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2010, 44 (01) :101-108
[6]  
Bandura A., 1986, Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory, V1, DOI DOI 10.5465/AMR.1987.4306538
[7]  
Ben David MF, 2001, MED TEACH, V23, P535
[8]   Developing and testing changes in delivery of care [J].
Berwick, DM .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 128 (08) :651-656
[9]   Coaching medical students in receiving effective feedback [J].
Bing-You, RG ;
Bertsch, T ;
Thompson, JA .
TEACHING AND LEARNING IN MEDICINE, 1998, 10 (04) :228-231
[10]   The plight of premedical education: Myths and misperceptions - Part I: The "premedical syndrome" [J].
Brieger, GH .
ACADEMIC MEDICINE, 1999, 74 (08) :901-904