Prioritization within visual working memory reflects a flexible focus of attention

被引:19
作者
Sandry, Joshua [1 ]
Ricker, Timothy J. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Montclair State Univ, Psychol Dept, 1 Normal Ave, Montclair, NJ 07043 USA
[2] CUNY Coll Staten Isl, Staten Isl, NY USA
[3] CUNY, Grad Ctr, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Visual working memory; Attention; Flexibility; Cognitive control; Distinctiveness; Prioritization; Motivation; Strategy; Reward; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; DOPAMINERGIC MIDBRAIN; MONETARY INCENTIVES; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; IMMEDIATE RECALL; TARGET SELECTION; PRIORITY MAPS; TOP-DOWN; REWARD; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.3758/s13414-020-02049-4
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When motivated, people can keep nonrecent items in a list active during the presentation of new items, facilitating fast and accurate recall of the earlier items. It has been proposed that this occurs by flexibly orienting attention to a single prioritized list item, thus increasing the amount of attention-based maintenance directed toward this item at the expense of other items. This is manipulated experimentally by associating a single distinct feature with a higher reward value, such as a single red item in a list of black items. These findings may be more parsimoniously explained under a distinctiveness of encoding framework rather than a flexible attention allocation framework. The retrieval advantage for the prioritized list position may be because the incongruent feature stands out in the list perceptually and causes it to become better encoded. Across three visual working memory experiments, we contrast a flexible attention theory against a distinctiveness of encoding theory by manipulating the reward value associated with the incongruent feature. Findings from all three experiments show strong support in favor of the flexible attention theory and no support for the distinctiveness of encoding theory. We also evaluate and find no evidence that strategy use, motivation, or tiredness/fatigue associated with reward value can adequately explain flexible prioritization of attention. Flexible attentional prioritization effects may be best understood under the context of an online attentional refreshing mechanism.
引用
收藏
页码:2985 / 3004
页数:20
相关论文
共 118 条
[41]  
EYSENCK MW, 1980, B PSYCHONOMIC SOC, V15, P245
[42]   Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention [J].
Failing, Michel ;
Theeuwes, Jan .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2018, 25 (02) :514-538
[43]   Causes and consequences of limitations in visual working memory [J].
Fallon, Sean James ;
Zokaei, Nahid ;
Husain, Masud .
YEAR IN COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2016, 1369 :40-54
[44]   Reward Acts on the pFC to Enhance Distractor Resistance of Working Memory Representations [J].
Fallon, Sean James ;
Cools, Roshan .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 26 (12) :2812-2826
[45]   Salience, relevance, and firing: a priority map for target selection [J].
Fecteau, Jillian H. ;
Munoz, Douglas. P. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (08) :382-390
[46]  
Genzel L, 2017, STUD NEUROSCI, P3, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-45066-7_1
[47]   Integrating rewards and cognition in the frontal cortex [J].
Gilbert A.M. ;
Fiez J.A. .
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2004, 4 (4) :540-552
[48]   Can the Focus of Attention Accommodate Multiple, Separate Items? [J].
Gilchrist, Amanda L. ;
Cowan, Nelson .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2011, 37 (06) :1484-1502
[49]   Attentional priorities and access to short-term memory: Parietal interactions [J].
Gillebert, Celine R. ;
Dyrholm, Mads ;
Vangkilde, Signe ;
Kyllingsbaek, Soren ;
Peeters, Ronald ;
Vandenberghe, Rik .
NEUROIMAGE, 2012, 62 (03) :1551-1562
[50]   Learned Reward Association Improves Visual Working Memory [J].
Gong, Mengyuan ;
Li, Sheng .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2014, 40 (02) :841-856