Matrix Scaling and Balancing via Box Constrained Newton's Method and Interior Point Methods

被引:51
作者
Cohen, Michael B. [1 ]
Madry, Aleksander [1 ]
Tsipras, Dimitris [1 ]
Vladu, Adrian [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, 77 Massachusetts Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
来源
2017 IEEE 58TH ANNUAL SYMPOSIUM ON FOUNDATIONS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE (FOCS) | 2017年
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
matrix scaling; matrix balancing; Newton's method; interior point methods; SDD solver; ALGORITHMS; COMPLEXITY;
D O I
10.1109/FOCS.2017.88
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
In this paper(1), we study matrix scaling and balancing, which are fundamental problems in scientific computing, with a long line of work on them that dates back to the 1960s. We provide algorithms for both these problems that, ignoring logarithmic factors involving the dimension of the input matrix and the size of its entries, both run in time (O) over tilde (m log kappa log(2)(1/epsilon)) where epsilon is the amount of error we are willing to tolerate. Here, kappa represents the ratio between the largest and the smallest entries of the optimal scalings. This implies that our algorithms run in nearly-linear time whenever kappa is quasi-polynomial, which includes, in particular, the case of strictly positive matrices. We complement our results by providing a separate algorithm that uses an interior-point method and runs in time (O) over tilde (m(3/2) log(1/epsilon)). In order to establish these results, we develop a new second-order optimization framework that enables us to treat both problems in a unified and principled manner. This framework identifies a certain generalization of linear system solving that we can use to efficiently minimize a broad class of functions, which we call second-order robust. We then show that in the context of the specific functions capturing matrix scaling and balancing, we can leverage and generalize the work on Laplacian system solving to make the algorithms obtained via this framework very efficient.
引用
收藏
页码:902 / 913
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], FOCS 10
[2]  
[Anonymous], FOCS 16
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1937, De Ingenieur
[4]  
[Anonymous], STOC 16
[5]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV170402315
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P 36 ANN ACM S THEOR, DOI [DOI 10.1145/1007352, DOI 10.1145/1007352.1007372]
[7]  
[Anonymous], ARXIV170402310
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2016, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2020, Lectures on modern convex optimization
[10]  
Blackford S., BALANCING CONDITIONI