Speed of sound ultrasound: comparison with proton density fat fraction assessed with Dixon MRI for fat content quantification of the lower extremity

被引:12
|
作者
Ruby, Lisa [1 ]
Kunut, Ahmet [1 ]
Nakhostin, Dominik N. [1 ]
Huber, Florian A. [1 ]
Finkenstaedt, Tim [2 ]
Frauenfelder, Thomas [1 ]
Sanabria, Sergio J. [1 ]
Rominger, Marga B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Zurich Ultrasound Res & Translat ZURT, Ramistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Zurich, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, Ramistr 100, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Ultrasonography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Skeletal muscle; Adipose tissue; MUSCLE; SARCOPENIA;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-020-06885-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare speed of sound (SoS) ultrasound (US) of the calves with Dixon magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for fat content quantification. Materials and methods The study was approved by the local ethics committee. Fifty calf muscles of 35 women (age range 22-81 years) prospectively underwent an US and subsequent MRI (Dixon sequence) examination as well as body weight and impedance fat measurements. SoS (in m/s) was calculated positioning a reflector on the opposite side of a conventional US machine probe with the calf in between. Fiducial nitroglycerin markers were placed on the calf at the reflector and US probe end positions for later registration of the US sonification volumetric section. An automatic segmentation algorithm separated MRI adipose tissue, muscle and bone regions. MRI fat fraction of the entire leg slice (total) and intramuscular and adipose tissue fat fraction were calculated and correlation analysis and correlation coefficient comparison were performed. Results Median SoS demonstrated a very strong (r = - 0.83 (95% CI - 0.90; - 0.72); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI total fat fraction, a strong (r = - 0.61 (95% CI - 0.76; - 0.40); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI adipose tissue fat fraction and a moderate (r = - 0.54 (95% CI - 0.71; - 0.31); p < 0.001) correlation with MRI intramuscular fat fraction. Impedance body fat percentage correlated strongly with SoS (r = - 0.72 (95% CI - 0.85; - 0.51); p < 0.001) and MRI total fat fraction (r = 0.61 (95% CI 0.34; 0.78); p < 0.001). For electrical impedance, significantly lower correlations (p = 0.033) were found for MRI total fat fraction compared with SoS. Conclusions Correlations of SoS with Dixon MRI fat fraction measurements were very strong to moderate.
引用
收藏
页码:5272 / 5280
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Speed of sound ultrasound: comparison with proton density fat fraction assessed with Dixon MRI for fat content quantification of the lower extremity
    Lisa Ruby
    Ahmet Kunut
    Dominik N. Nakhostin
    Florian A. Huber
    Tim Finkenstaedt
    Thomas Frauenfelder
    Sergio J. Sanabria
    Marga B. Rominger
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 5272 - 5280
  • [2] Quantification of Hepatic Steatosis by Ultrasound: Prospective Comparison With MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction as Reference Standard
    Dillman, Jonathan R.
    Thapaliya, Samjhana
    Tkach, Jean A.
    Trout, Andrew T.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2022, 219 (05) : 784 - 791
  • [3] Quantification of Liver Fat Content With Unenhanced MDCT: Phantom and Clinical Correlation With MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction
    Pickhardt, Perry J.
    Graffy, Peter M.
    Reeder, Scott B.
    Hernando, Diego
    Li, Ke
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 211 (03) : W151 - W157
  • [4] Comparison of Multimaterial Decomposition Fat Fraction with DECT and Proton Density Fat Fraction with IDEAL IQ MRI for Quantification of Liver Steatosis in a Population Exposed to Chemotherapy
    Corrias, Giuseppe
    Erta, Marco
    Sini, Marcello
    Sardu, Claudia
    Saba, Luca
    Mahmood, Usman
    Castellanos, Sandra Huicochea
    Bates, David
    Mondanelli, Nicola
    Thomsen, Brian
    Carollo, Gabriella
    Sawan, Peter
    Mannelli, Lorenzo
    DOSE-RESPONSE, 2021, 19 (02):
  • [5] iATT liver fat quantification for steatosis grading by referring to MRI proton density fat fraction: a multicenter study
    Hirooka, Masashi
    Ogawa, Sadanobu
    Koizumi, Yohei
    Yoshida, Yuichi
    Goto, Tatsuya
    Yasuda, Satoshi
    Yamahira, Masahiro
    Tamai, Tsutomu
    Kuromatsu, Ryoko
    Matsuzaki, Toshihisa
    Suehiro, Tomoyuki
    Kamada, Yoshihiro
    Sumida, Yoshio
    Hiasa, Yoichi
    Toyoda, Hidenori
    Kumada, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 59 (06) : 504 - 514
  • [6] MRI-derived proton density fat fraction
    Yoshizawa, Eriko
    Yamada, Akira
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2021, 48 (04) : 497 - 506
  • [7] MRI-derived proton density fat fraction
    Eriko Yoshizawa
    Akira Yamada
    Journal of Medical Ultrasonics, 2021, 48 : 497 - 506
  • [8] Regional Variability in Liver Fat Content in Pediatric NAFLD and Adult NASH Assessed by Proton Density Fat Fraction Imaging
    Ali, Zifan
    Peng, Zihan
    Lee, Madilyn
    Wauters, Malaika
    Weeks, Jake
    Middleton, Michael
    Loomba, Rohit
    Sirlin, Claude
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 119 (10S): : S1303 - S1304
  • [9] Quantitative MRI Proton Density Fat Fraction: A Coming of Age
    Dyke, Jonathan P.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (03) : 652 - 653
  • [10] Novel Quantification of Liver Fat by Ultrasound Backscatter Technique & its Correlation with MRI-estimated Proton Density Fat Fraction in NAFLD vs Healthy Controls
    Loomba, Rohit
    Alturki, Abdullah
    Han, A.
    Lam, Jessica
    Ang, Brandon
    Bhatt, Archana
    Hooker, Jonathan
    Shah, A.
    Zand, K.
    Middleton, Michael S.
    Wolfson, Tanya
    O'Brien, William D.
    Sirlin, Claude B.
    Andre, Michael P.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2013, 58 : 498A - 498A