Assessing Canadian women's preferences for cervical cancer screening: A brief report

被引:4
作者
Zhu, Patricia [1 ,2 ]
Tatar, Ovidiu [1 ,3 ]
Haward, Ben [1 ]
Griffin-Mathieu, Gabrielle [1 ]
Perez, Samara [1 ,4 ]
Smith, Laurie [5 ]
Brotherton, Julia [6 ,7 ]
Ogilvie, Gina [5 ]
Rosberger, Zeev [1 ,2 ,8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Jewish Gen Hosp, Lady Davis Inst Med Res, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] McGill Univ, Dept Psychiat, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal CRCHUM, Res Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ Hlth Ctr, Cedars Canc Ctr, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] BC Womens Hosp, Womens Hlth Res Inst, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Populat & Global Hlth, Carlton, Vic, Australia
[7] Australian Ctr Prevent Cerv Canc, East Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] McGill Univ, Dept Psychol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[9] McGill Univ, Dept Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
human papillomavirus; cervical cancer screening; cancer prevention; Best-Worst Scaling; HPV test; cytology; women's preferences for cervical cancer screening; HUMAN-PAPILLOMAVIRUS; FOLLOW-UP; CYTOLOGY;
D O I
10.3389/fpubh.2022.962039
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Human papillomavirus (HPV) testing is recommended for primary screening for cervical cancer by several health authorities. Several countries that have implemented HPV testing programs have encountered resistance against extended screening intervals and older age of initiation. As Canada prepares to implement HPV testing programs, it is important to understand women's preferences toward cervical cancer screening to ensure a smooth transition. The objective of this study was to assess Canadian women's current preferences toward cervical cancer screening. Using a web-based survey, we recruited underscreened ( > 3 years since last Pap test) and adequately screened (< 3 years since last Pap test) Canadian women aged 21-70 who were biologically female and had a cervix. We used Best-Worst Scaling (BWS) methodology to collect data on women's preferences for different screening methods, screening intervals, and ages of initiation. We used conditional logistic regression to estimate preferences in both subgroups. In both subgroups, women preferred screening every three years compared to every five or ten years, and initiating screening at age 21 compared to age 25 or 30. Adequately screened women (n = 503) most preferred co-testing, while underscreened women (n = 524) preferred both co-testing and HPV self-sampling over Pap testing. Regardless of screening status, women preferred shorter screening intervals, an earlier age of initiation, and co-testing. Adequate communication from public health authorities is needed to explain the extended screening intervals and age of initiation to prevent resistance against these changes to cervical cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Human papillomavirus testing versus cytology in primary cervical cancer screening: End-of-study and extended follow-up results from the Canadian cervical cancer screening trial
    Isidean, Sandra D.
    Mayrand, Marie-Helene
    Ramanakumar, Agnihotram V.
    Gilbert, Laura
    Reid, Stephanie L.
    Rodrigues, Isabel
    Ferenczy, Alex
    Ratnam, Sam
    Coutlee, Francois
    Franco, Eduardo L.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2016, 139 (11) : 2456 - 2466
  • [32] Cervical Cancer Screening Preferences among African American Women in the Mississippi Delta
    Litton, Allison G.
    Castle, Philip E.
    Partridge, Edward E.
    Scarinci, Isabel C.
    JOURNAL OF HEALTH CARE FOR THE POOR AND UNDERSERVED, 2013, 24 (01) : 46 - 55
  • [33] Women's experiences of repeated HPV testing in the context of cervical cancer screening: A qualitative study
    Waller, Jo
    McCaffery, Kirsten
    Kitchener, Henn
    Nazroo, James
    Wardle, Jane
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2007, 16 (03) : 196 - 204
  • [34] Efficacy of screening in preventing cervical cancer among older women
    Kamineni, Aruna
    Weinmann, Sheila
    Shy, Kirkwood K.
    Glass, Andrew G.
    Weiss, Noel S.
    CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (09) : 1653 - 1660
  • [35] Evaluation of a validated methylation triage signature for human papillomavirus positive women in the HPV FOCAL cervical cancer screening trial
    Cook, Darrel A.
    Krajden, Mel
    Brentnall, Adam R.
    Gondara, Lovedeep
    Chan, Tracy
    Law, Jennifer H.
    Smith, Laurie W.
    van Niekerk, Dirk J.
    Ogilvie, Gina S.
    Coldman, Andrew J.
    Warman, Rhian
    Reuter, Caroline
    Cuzick, Jack
    Lorincz, Attila T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 144 (10) : 2587 - 2595
  • [36] Cervical Cancer Screening for Women With Disabilities: Time for a New Approach?
    Nguyen, Anh Q.
    Mandigo, Morgan
    Coleman, Jenell S.
    JOURNAL OF LOWER GENITAL TRACT DISEASE, 2018, 22 (04) : 318 - 319
  • [37] Efficacy of screening in preventing cervical cancer among older women
    Aruna Kamineni
    Sheila Weinmann
    Kirkwood K. Shy
    Andrew G. Glass
    Noel S. Weiss
    Cancer Causes & Control, 2013, 24 : 1653 - 1660
  • [38] Determinants of Cervical Cancer Screening Among Rural Women in Zimbabwe
    Mundagowa, Paddington T.
    Tapera, Oscar
    Guzha, Bothwell
    Fitzpatrick, Megan Burke
    Mandishora, Racheal S. Dube
    Kanyangarara, Mufaro
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2025, 42 (02) : 621 - 630
  • [39] HPV Screening Test for the Detection of Precancerous Cervical Lesions and Cervical Cancer in Israeli Women
    Feinberg, Tali
    Yehuda-Shnaidman, Einav
    Wolf, Tamar
    Sandbank, Judith
    Segal, Jacob
    Vaknin, Zvi
    Schejter, Eduardo
    ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 2021, 65 (06) : 494 - 500
  • [40] Cervical cancer screening history prior to a diagnosis of cervical cancer in Danish women aged 60 years and older-A national cohort study
    Hammer, Anne
    Soegaard, Vibeke
    Maimbure, Rikke D.
    Blaakaer, Jan
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (01): : 418 - 427