Soil quality assessment in rice production systems: Establishing a minimum data set

被引:63
作者
de Lima, Ana Claudia Rodrigues [1 ,2 ]
Hoogmoed, Willem [1 ]
Brussaard, Lijbert [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Farm Technol Grp, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Dept Soil Qual, NL-6700 AA Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.2134/jeq2006.0280
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Soil quality; as a measure of the soil's capacity to function, can be assessed by indicators based on physical, chemical, and biological properties. Here we report on the assessment of soil quality in 21 rice (Oryza sativa) fields under three rice production systems (semi-direct, pre-germinated, and conventional) on four soil textural classes in the Camaqua region of Pin Grande do Sul, Brazil. The objectives of our study were: (i) to identify soil quality indicators that discriminate both management systems and soil textural classes, (ii) to establish a minimum data set of soil quality indicators and (iii) to test whether this minimum data set is correlated with yield. Twenty-nine soil biological, chemical, and physical properties were evaluated to characterize regional soil quality, Soil quality assessment was based on factor and discriminant analysis. Bulk density, available water, and micronutrients (Cu, Zn, and Mn) were the most powerful soil properties in distinguishing among different soil textural classes. Organic matter, earthworms, micronutrients (Cu and Mn), and mean weight diameter were the most powerful soil properties m assessing differences in soil quality among the rice management systems. Manganese was the property most strongly correlated with yield (adjusted r(2) =0.365, P = 0.001). The merits of subdividing samples according to texture and the linkage between soil quality indicators, soil functioning, plant performance, and soil management options are discussed in particular.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 630
页数:8
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, KEYS SOIL TAXONOMY, V10th
  • [2] [Anonymous], ARROZ IRRIGADO BRASI
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, TROPICAL SOIL BIOL F, DOI [10.2307/2261129, DOI 10.2307/2261129]
  • [4] Identifying critical limits for soil quality indicators in agro-ecosystems
    Arshad, MA
    Martin, S
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 88 (02) : 153 - 160
  • [5] ASSIS MP, 2000, J CRESCIMENTO CIEN A, V24, P87
  • [6] Babin B.J., 1998, Multivariate data analysis, V5th ed.
  • [7] Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: II. Northern Mississippi Loess Hills and Palouse Prairie
    Brejda, JJ
    Karlen, DL
    Smith, JL
    Allan, DL
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (06) : 2125 - 2135
  • [8] Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern high plains
    Brejda, JJ
    Moorman, TB
    Karlen, DL
    Dao, TH
    [J]. SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2000, 64 (06) : 2115 - 2124
  • [9] Bundy L. G., 1994, METHODS SOIL ANAL 2
  • [10] Assessing soil quality under long-term rice-based cropping system
    Chaudhury, M
    Mandal, UK
    Sharma, KL
    Ghosh, H
    Mandal, B
    [J]. COMMUNICATIONS IN SOIL SCIENCE AND PLANT ANALYSIS, 2005, 36 (9-10) : 1141 - 1161