Hypomanic/manic switch after transcranial magnetic stimulation in mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Miuli, Andrea [1 ]
Sepede, Gianna [1 ]
Stigliano, Gianfranco [1 ]
Mosca, Alessio [1 ]
Di Carlo, Francesco [1 ]
d'Andrea, Giacomo [1 ]
Lalli, Aliseo [1 ]
Spano, Maria Chiara [2 ]
Pettorruso, Mauro [1 ]
Martinotti, Giovanni [1 ,3 ]
di Giannantonio, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, ITAB Via Vestini 33, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat Affect Neuropsychiat, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Clin Sci, Dept Pharm, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2021年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
Hypomanic; manic switch; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Active vs sham comparison; Mood disorders; Adverse event; Safety; MAJOR DEPRESSION; LOW-FREQUENCY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REPETITIVE TMS; SAFETY; MANIA; ANTIDEPRESSANT; RTMS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.5498/wjp.v11.i8.477
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Nowadays there is an increasing use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) both in neurological and psychiatric fields. After Food and Drug Administration approval of TMS for the therapy of treatment-resistant depression, TMS has been widely used in the context of mood disorders (MD). However, growing reports regarding the possibility of developing hypomanic/manic switch (HMS) have generated concern regarding its use in MDs. AIM To investigate the actual risk of developing HMS due to TMS in the treatment of MD. METHODS We led our research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on March 22, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. Only double blind/single blind studies, written in English and focused on the TMS treatment of MD, were included. A meta-analysis of repetitive TMS protocol studies including HMS was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The assessment of Risk of Bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool. This protocol was registered on PROSPERO with the CRD42020175811 code. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included in our meta-analysis: Twenty-one double blind randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four single blind-RCT (no. of subjects involved in active stimulation = 576; no. of subjects involved in sham protocol = 487). The most frequently treated pathology was major depressive episode/major depressive disorder, followed by resistant depression, bipolar depression and other MD. The majority of the studies used a repetitive TMS protocol, and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was the main target area. Side effects were reported in eight studies and HMS (described as greater energy, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, suicidal attempt) in four studies. When comparing active TMS vs sham treatment, the risk of developing HMS was not significantly different between conditions. CONCLUSION Applying the most usual protocols and the appropriate precautionary measures, TMS seems not to be related to HMS development.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 490
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails
    Lan, Lihuan
    Zhang, Xiaoni
    Li, Xiangpen
    Rong, Xiaoming
    Peng, Ying
    JOURNAL OF HEADACHE AND PAIN, 2017, 18
  • [42] Durability of antidepressant response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Senova, Suhan
    Cotovio, Goncalo
    Pascual-Leone, Alvaro
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2019, 12 (01) : 119 - 128
  • [43] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Tourette syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hsu, Chih-Wei
    Wang, Liang-Jen
    Lin, Pao-Yen
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (05) : 1110 - 1118
  • [44] Optimally combining transcranial magnetic stimulation with antidepressants in major depressive disorder: A systematic review and Meta-analysis
    Rakesh, Gopalkumar
    Cordero, Patrick
    Khanal, Rebika
    Himelhoch, Seth S.
    Rush, Craig R.
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2024, 358 : 432 - 439
  • [45] Placebo effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on negative symptoms and cognition in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Mingqi
    Lu, Shensen
    Hao, Lu
    Xia, Yifei
    Shi, Zhenchun
    Su, Lei
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHIATRY, 2024, 15
  • [46] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Major Depressive Disorder in Older Adults: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Valiengo, Leandro
    Maia, Ana
    Cotovio, Goncalo
    Gordon, Pedro C.
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Forlenza, Orestes, V
    Oliveira-Maia, Albino J.
    JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 77 (04): : 851 - 860
  • [47] How Can Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Be Used to Modulate Episodic Memory?: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Yeh, Nicholas
    Rose, Nathan S.
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [48] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for Alzheimer's disease: an overview of systematic reviews and meta-analysis
    Xue, Hua
    Li, Ya-Xin
    Xiao, Ya-Song
    Fan, Wen-Hui
    He, Hong-Xian
    FRONTIERS IN AGING NEUROSCIENCE, 2024, 16
  • [49] Cognitive functioning and deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (DTMS) in major psychiatric disorders: A systematic review
    Kedzior, Karina Karolina
    Gierke, Lioba
    Gellersen, Helena Marie
    Berlim, Marcelo T.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2016, 75 : 107 - 115
  • [50] BDNF blood levels after electroconvulsive therapy in patients with mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    Baeken, Chris
    Machado-Vieira, Rodrigo
    Gattaz, Wagner F.
    Vanderhasselt, Marie-Anne
    WORLD JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2014, 15 (05) : 411 - 418