Hypomanic/manic switch after transcranial magnetic stimulation in mood disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:11
|
作者
Miuli, Andrea [1 ]
Sepede, Gianna [1 ]
Stigliano, Gianfranco [1 ]
Mosca, Alessio [1 ]
Di Carlo, Francesco [1 ]
d'Andrea, Giacomo [1 ]
Lalli, Aliseo [1 ]
Spano, Maria Chiara [2 ]
Pettorruso, Mauro [1 ]
Martinotti, Giovanni [1 ,3 ]
di Giannantonio, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ G dAnnunzio, Dept Neurosci Imaging & Clin Sci, ITAB Via Vestini 33, I-66100 Chieti, Italy
[2] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Psychiat Affect Neuropsychiat, S-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Hertfordshire, Clin Sci, Dept Pharm, Hatfield AL10 9AB, Herts, England
来源
WORLD JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY | 2021年 / 11卷 / 08期
关键词
Hypomanic; manic switch; Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Active vs sham comparison; Mood disorders; Adverse event; Safety; MAJOR DEPRESSION; LOW-FREQUENCY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; REPETITIVE TMS; SAFETY; MANIA; ANTIDEPRESSANT; RTMS; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.5498/wjp.v11.i8.477
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND Nowadays there is an increasing use of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) both in neurological and psychiatric fields. After Food and Drug Administration approval of TMS for the therapy of treatment-resistant depression, TMS has been widely used in the context of mood disorders (MD). However, growing reports regarding the possibility of developing hypomanic/manic switch (HMS) have generated concern regarding its use in MDs. AIM To investigate the actual risk of developing HMS due to TMS in the treatment of MD. METHODS We led our research on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science on March 22, 2020, in accordance to the PRISMA guidelines for systematic review. Only double blind/single blind studies, written in English and focused on the TMS treatment of MD, were included. A meta-analysis of repetitive TMS protocol studies including HMS was conducted using RevMan 5.4 software. The assessment of Risk of Bias was done using Cochrane risk of bias tool. This protocol was registered on PROSPERO with the CRD42020175811 code. RESULTS Twenty-five studies were included in our meta-analysis: Twenty-one double blind randomized controlled trials (RCT) and four single blind-RCT (no. of subjects involved in active stimulation = 576; no. of subjects involved in sham protocol = 487). The most frequently treated pathology was major depressive episode/major depressive disorder, followed by resistant depression, bipolar depression and other MD. The majority of the studies used a repetitive TMS protocol, and the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex was the main target area. Side effects were reported in eight studies and HMS (described as greater energy, insomnia, irritability, anxiety, suicidal attempt) in four studies. When comparing active TMS vs sham treatment, the risk of developing HMS was not significantly different between conditions. CONCLUSION Applying the most usual protocols and the appropriate precautionary measures, TMS seems not to be related to HMS development.
引用
收藏
页码:477 / 490
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
    Sun, Pingping
    Fang, Lei
    Zhang, Jianzhong
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Guodong
    Qi, Rui
    PAIN MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (03) : 499 - 514
  • [32] The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on empathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, C. -C.
    Khalifa, N.
    Vollm, B.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2018, 48 (05) : 737 - 750
  • [33] Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic tinnitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Liang, Zhengrong
    Yang, Haidi
    Cheng, Gui
    Huang, Lingfei
    Zhang, Tao
    Jia, Haiying
    BMC PSYCHIATRY, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [34] Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a treatment for posttraumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis
    Harris, Adam
    Reece, John
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2021, 289 : 55 - 65
  • [35] Therapeutic effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on cognitive impairment in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Gong, Cheng
    Hu, Hao
    Peng, Xu-Miao
    Li, Hai
    Xiao, Li
    Liu, Zhen
    Zhong, Yan-Biao
    Wang, Mao-Yuan
    Luo, Yun
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [36] Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic migraine: A meta-analysis
    Zhong, Jiugen
    Lan, Wanting
    Feng, Yanqing
    Yu, Ligen
    Xiao, Rang
    Shen, Yingying
    Zou, Zhi
    Hou, Xiaohui
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2022, 13
  • [37] A systematic review and meta-analysis on placebo response to repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression trials
    Razza, Lais B.
    Moffa, Adriano H.
    Moreno, Marina L.
    Carvalho, Andre F.
    Padberg, Frank
    Fregni, Felipe
    Brunoni, Andre R.
    PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 81 : 105 - 113
  • [38] Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Trevizol, Alisson Paulino
    Shiozawa, Pedro
    Cook, Ian A.
    Sato, Isa Albuquerque
    Kaku, Caio Barbosa
    Guimaraes, Fernanda Bs.
    Sachdev, Perminder
    Sarkhel, Sujit
    Cordeiro, Quirino
    JOURNAL OF ECT, 2016, 32 (04) : 262 - 266
  • [39] Magnesium and mood disorders: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Phelan, Danny
    Molero, Patricio
    Martinez-Gonzalez, Miguel A.
    Molendijk, Marc
    BJPSYCH OPEN, 2018, 4 (04): : 167 - 179
  • [40] Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Tinnitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Dong, Changhong
    Chen, Cheng
    Wang, Teng
    Gao, Chunjiu
    Wang, Yidan
    Guan, Xinying
    Dong, Xin
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2020, 2020