Food waste disposal and utilization in the United States: A spatial cost benefit analysis

被引:38
作者
Badgett, Alex [1 ]
Milbrandt, Anelia [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Renewable Energy Lab, 15013 Denver W Pkwy, Golden, CO 80401 USA
关键词
Food waste; Biopower; Biofuels; Bioproducts; Waste-to-energy; Cost-benefit analysis; MUNICIPAL SOLID-WASTE; TO-ENERGY; HYDROTHERMAL LIQUEFACTION; ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; MANAGEMENT; BIOGAS; WET;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128057
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Food waste is generated from residential, commercial, institutional, and industrial sources, and is conventionally disposed of in landfills. To nurture the development of a circular economy for food waste, its valorization by technologies that create fuels, power, or products is being investigated. These technologies offer the potential to dispose food waste while generating sustainable resources. While some literature exists on the economics of food waste utilization options, no existing study simultaneously characterizes different facility scales and locations across many food waste pathways. This study develops a series of cost-benefit models that depict the economic favorability of several food waste management pathways by state: landfilling, composting, anaerobic digestion, incineration, and biofuels production via hydrothermal liquefaction. Economic favorability primarily depends on the local tipping (gate) fee charged by the facility; however, additional revenue streams realized from the sale of biofuels, biopower, or bioproducts can reduce this dependence. Local market prices for biofuels, biopower, or bioproducts generated from food waste determine the profitability of technologies that generate these products. The magnitude of these revenue streams depends on local market factors and the economies of scale leveraged for large facilities. Significant spatial variability in these results exists across the United States, driven by the differences in tipping fees, O&M costs (e.g., labor rates), and product market prices. This study supports decisionmaking by industry, state, and local governments, as well as furthering research in the area of sustainable utilization of food waste.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [11] Review of comparative LCAs of food waste management systems - Current status and potential improvements
    Bernstad, A.
    Jansen, J. la Cour
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2012, 32 (12) : 2439 - 2455
  • [12] Billing J.M., 2017, CONCEPTUAL BIOREFINE, DOI [10.3389/fimmu.2012.00346, DOI 10.3389/FIMMU.2012.00346]
  • [13] Breslin M, 2015, AM RECYCLER NEWS INC
  • [14] California Air Resources Board, 2020, Low Carbon Fuel Standard
  • [15] Calrecycle, 2020, CAL AN DIG PROJ ACC
  • [16] Hydrothermal liquefaction of agricultural and forestry wastes: state-of-the-art review and future prospects
    Cao, Leichang
    Zhang, Cheng
    Chen, Huihui
    Tsang, Daniel C. W.
    Luo, Gang
    Zhang, Shicheng
    Chen, Jianmin
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 245 : 1184 - 1193
  • [17] A comprehensive analysis of food waste derived liquefaction bio-oil properties for industrial application
    Chen, Wei-Hsin
    Lin, Yu-Ying
    Liu, Hsuah-Cheng
    Chen, Teng-Chien
    Hung, Chun-Hung
    Chen, Chi-Hui
    Ong, Hwai Chyuan
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 237 : 283 - 291
  • [18] Christensen T.H., 2011, SOLID WASTE TECHNOLO, DOI [10.1002/9780470666883.ch1, DOI 10.1002/9780470666883.CH1]
  • [19] Life cycle costing of food waste: A review of methodological approaches
    De Menna, Fabio
    Dietershagen, Jana
    Loubiere, Marion
    Vittuari, Matteo
    [J]. WASTE MANAGEMENT, 2018, 73 : 1 - 13
  • [20] Energy valorisation of food processing residues and model compounds by hydrothermal liquefaction
    Deniel, Maxime
    Haarlemmer, Geert
    Roubaud, Anne
    Weiss-Hortala, Elsa
    Fages, Jacques
    [J]. RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2016, 54 : 1632 - 1652