Three-dimensional Cervical Movement Characteristics in Healthy Subjects and Subgroups of Chronic Neck Pain Patients Based on Their Pain Location

被引:8
作者
Waeyaert, Patirck [1 ]
Jansen, Daniel [1 ]
Bastiaansen, Marco [1 ]
Scafoglieri, Aldo [1 ]
Buyl, Ronald [2 ]
Schmitt, Maarten [3 ]
Cattrysse, Erik [1 ]
机构
[1] VUB, Expt Anat Dept, Brussels, Belgium
[2] VUB, Biomed Stat & Informat Dept, Brussels, Belgium
[3] SOMT, Amersfoort, Netherlands
关键词
cervical spine; kinematics; neck pain; pain location; qualitative parameters; quantitative parameters; subgrouping; ELECTROMAGNETIC TRACKING SYSTEM; NORMAL GLOBAL MOTION; ASYMPTOMATIC PERSONS; NONSPECIFIC NECK; SPINAL PALPATION; RANGE; RELIABILITY; BIRDS; FLOCK; AGE;
D O I
10.1097/BRS.0000000000001500
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A cross-sectional observational study of three-dimensional (3D) cervical kinematics in 41 chronic neck pain (CNPs) patients and 156 asymptomatic controls. Objective. The objective was to investigate 3D cervical kinematics by analyzing and comparing quantitative and qualitative parameters in healthy subjects and CNPs. Furthermore, subgroups were formed to explore the influence of pain-location on cervical kinematics. The possible correlation of kinematic parameters with the degree of functional disability was examined as well. Summary of Background Data. In patients with chronic neck pain, a clear pathological cause is frequently not identifiable. Therefore, the need to assess neck pain with a broader view than structure or anatomical-based divergences is desirable. Methods. Movements of the cervical spine were registered using an electromagnetic tracking system. Quantitative and qualitative kinematics were analyzed for active axial rotation, lateral bending, and flexion-extension motion components. Results. During lateral bending, the range of the main motion demonstrated significant higher values (P = 0.001) in the controls (mean: 68.67 degrees +/- 15.17 degrees) than patients (mean: 59.28 degrees +/- 15.41 degrees). Significant differences were demonstrated between subgroups for several kinematic parameters (P<0.05). Although differences were predominantly recorded between the "symmetrical'' and "asymmetrical'' pain group, some parameters also distinguished subgroups from controls. On average, the symmetrical group showed significant less harmonic movement patterns, expressed by qualitative parameters, in comparison with the "asymmetrical'' group and controls. Furthermore, the "asymmetrical'' group showed significant lower scores on quantitative parameters than the "symmetrical'' group and controls. The degree of functional disability correlated moderately with changes in qualitative parameters. Conclusion. In this study, chronic neck pain patients with a symmetrical pain pattern showed significant poorer quality of movement, while those with asymmetrical pain showed a significant reduction in quantitative measures. Subgrouping of neck patients based on pain location may be of help for further research and clinics.
引用
收藏
页码:E908 / E914
页数:7
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] Validity and reliability of palpation-digitization for non-invasive kinematic measurement - A systematic review
    Adhia, Divya Bharatkumar
    Bussey, Melanie D.
    Ribeiro, Daniel Cury
    Tumilty, Steve
    Milosavljevic, Stephan
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2013, 18 (01) : 26 - 34
  • [2] Assessment of the cervical range of motion over time, differences between results of the Flock of Birds and the EDI-320: A comparison between an electromagnetic tracking system and an electronic inclinometer
    Assink, Nienke
    Bergman, Gert J. D.
    Knoester, Bianca
    Winters, Jan C.
    Dijkstra, Pieter U.
    [J]. MANUAL THERAPY, 2008, 13 (05) : 450 - 455
  • [3] The Effect of Neck Pain on Cervical Kinematics, as Assessed in a Virtual Environment
    Bahat, Hilla Sarig
    Weiss, Patrice L.
    Laufer, Yocheved
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2010, 91 (12): : 1884 - 1890
  • [4] Variation in the cervical range of motion over time measured by the "Flock of Birds" electromagnetic tracking system
    Bergman, GJD
    Knoester, B
    Assink, N
    Dijkstra, PU
    Winters, JC
    [J]. SPINE, 2005, 30 (06) : 650 - 654
  • [5] Biomechanics of the cervical spine. I: Normal kinematics
    Bogduk, N
    Mercer, S
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2000, 15 (09) : 633 - 648
  • [6] The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: a systematic review
    Borghouts, JAJ
    Koes, BW
    Bouter, LM
    [J]. PAIN, 1998, 77 (01) : 1 - 13
  • [7] Reliability and normative database of the zebris cervical range-of-motion system in healthy controls with preliminary validation in a group of patients with neck pain
    Cagnie, Barbara
    Cools, Ann
    De Loose, Veerle
    Cambier, Dirk
    Danneels, Lieven
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2007, 30 (06) : 450 - 455
  • [8] Changed cervical kinematics after fusion surgery
    Cattrysse, E.
    Moens, M.
    Schaillee, E.
    D'Haens, J.
    Van Roy, P.
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (07) : 1353 - 1359
  • [9] Neck pain: Clinical practice guidelines linked to the international classification of functioning, disability, and health from the orthopaedic section of the American physical therapy association
    Childs, John D.
    Cleland, Joshua A.
    Elliott, James M.
    Teyhen, Deydre S.
    Wainner, Robert S.
    Whitman, Julie M.
    Sopky, Bernard J.
    Godges, Joseph J.
    Flynn, Timothy W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2008, 38 (09) : A1 - A34
  • [10] Cervical range of motion discriminates between asymptomatic persons and those with whiplash
    Dall'Alba, PT
    Sterling, MM
    Treleaven, JM
    Edwards, SL
    Jull, GA
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (19) : 2090 - 2094