Effects of rice straw ratio on mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of swine manure and rice straw mixture

被引:30
作者
Xiao, Benyi [1 ,2 ]
Tang, Xinyi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Wenzhe [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Ke [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Tang [1 ,3 ]
Han, Yunping [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Junxin [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Res Ctr Ecoenvironm Sci, Beijing 100085, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
[3] Qingdao Univ Technol, Sch Environm & Municipal Engn, Qingdao 266033, Peoples R China
关键词
Mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion; Microbial community; Rice straw ratio; Swine manure; Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; FOOD WASTE; PROCESS STABILITY; BIOGAS PRODUCTION; SINGLE-STAGE; PIG MANURE; PERFORMANCE; TEMPERATURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.energy.2021.122021
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion (Co-AD) of swine manure (SM) and rice straw (RS) mixtures was evaluated in lab-scale continuously stirred tank reactors through long-term semi-continuous experiments to investigate the effects of three RS ratios (25%, 33.3%, and 50%, based on total solids). The experimental results showed that an increase in the RS ratio reduced the biogas and methane production, and methane content in both Co-ADs and the effects of the increased RS ratio on the mesophilic Co-AD (Co-MAD) were slightly lower than those on the thermophilic Co-AD (Co-TAD). The digestate characteristics were also affected by the RS ratio. A reduction analysis demonstrated the higher importance of the RS ratio in the substrate with respect to gas production in Co-MAD compared to Co -TAD. The increase in the RS ratio increased the relative abundance of Clostridium_sensu_strricto_1, and changed the predominant archaea and methanogenesis pathways in both Co-ADs. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
American Public Health Association, 2017, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, V23rd ed.
[2]   Characterization and prediction of organic nitrogen biodegradability during anaerobic digestion: A bioaccessibility approach [J].
Bareha, Y. ;
Girault, R. ;
Jimenez, J. ;
Tremier, A. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2018, 263 :425-436
[3]   Biodegradation of rice straw under anaerobic digestion [J].
Candia-Garcia, Cristian ;
Delgadillo-Mirquez, Liliana ;
Hernandez, Mauricio .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY & INNOVATION, 2018, 10 :215-222
[4]   Batch anaerobic co-digestion of proteins and carbohydrates [J].
Elbeshbishy, Elsayed ;
Nakhla, George .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 116 :170-178
[5]   Effects of Storage Conditions, Total Solids Content and Silage Additives on Fermentation Profiles and Methane Preservation of Cattle Manure Before Anaerobic Digestion [J].
Franco, Ruben Teixeira ;
Buffiere, Pierre ;
Bayard, Remy .
WASTE AND BIOMASS VALORIZATION, 2018, 9 (12) :2307-2317
[6]   The effect of temperature and retention time on methane production and microbial community composition in staged anaerobic digesters fed with food waste [J].
Gaby, John Christian ;
Zamanzadeh, Mirzaman ;
Horn, Svein Jarle .
BIOTECHNOLOGY FOR BIOFUELS, 2017, 10
[7]   Fate of antibiotic resistance genes during high-solid anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure with lignite [J].
Guo, Hai-Gang ;
Chen, Qing-Lin ;
Hu, Hang-Wei ;
He, Ji-Zheng .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 303
[8]   A comparison of microbial characteristics between the thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic digesters exposed to elevated food waste loadings [J].
Guo, Xiaohui ;
Wang, Cheng ;
Sun, Faqian ;
Zhu, Weijing ;
Wu, Weixiang .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 152 :420-428
[9]   Anaerobic co-digestion process for biogas production: Progress, challenges and perspectives [J].
Hagos, Kiros ;
Zong, Jianpeng ;
Li, Dongxue ;
Liu, Chang ;
Lu, Xiaohua .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 76 :1485-1496
[10]   Anaerobic digestion of swine manure: Inhibition by ammonia [J].
Hansen, KH ;
Angelidaki, I ;
Ahring, BK .
WATER RESEARCH, 1998, 32 (01) :5-12