Teaching Mathematics Integrating Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Investigating Prospective Teachers' Concerns and TPACK

被引:18
作者
Shin, Dongjo [1 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, 2 Busandaehak Ro 63beon Gil, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Intelligent tutoring system; Prospective mathematics teacher; Teacher concern; Technology positioning; TPACK; CONTENT KNOWLEDGE TPACK; TECHNOLOGY; CLASSROOMS; SUPPORT; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s10763-021-10221-x
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Intelligent tutoring systems (ITSs) have drawn researchers' attention as a means of providing personalized learning content, adaptive feedback, and instructional strategies based on students' characteristics and learning needs. Few studies, however, have explored how prospective and practicing teachers integrate ITSs into their lessons. This study examines the relationships among prospective teachers' concerns about the ITSs, their positioning of an ITSs when planning a math lesson, and their technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). The results indicate that the prospective teachers were intensively concerned with informational and personal aspects regarding ITSs and somewhat interested in modifying ITS-integrated teaching practices. The prospective teachers tended to assess themselves as having a high level of knowledge related to pedagogy but less knowledge about pedagogy and technology. Furthermore, the prospective teachers were more likely to position the ITSs as a servant than as a partner. When positioning the ITSs as a partner, they tended to plan their lessons based on in-the-moment student data provided by the ITS. In addition, the prospective teachers who positioned the ITS as a partner expressed more concern about modifying the ITSs and recognized that they had higher TPACK than those who positioned it as a servant.
引用
收藏
页码:1659 / 1676
页数:18
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Pre-service teachers' TPACK competencies for spreadsheet integration: insights from a mathematics-specific instructional technology course [J].
Agyei, Douglas D. ;
Voogt, Joke M. .
TECHNOLOGY PEDAGOGY AND EDUCATION, 2015, 24 (05) :605-625
[2]   Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) through performance assessment [J].
Akyuz, Didem .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2018, 125 :212-225
[3]  
Al-Rawajfih K., 2010, ASIAN SOCIAL SCI, V6, P54
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2000, PRINC STAND SCH MATH
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Principles to actions: Ensuring mathematical success for all
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
[7]   AI in education: learner choice and fundamental rights [J].
Berendt, Bettina ;
Littlejohn, Allison ;
Blakemore, Mike .
LEARNING MEDIA AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 45 (03) :312-324
[8]   The Role of Situational Interest in Personalized Learning [J].
Bernacki, Matthew L. ;
Walkington, Candace .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 110 (06) :864-881
[9]   Effects of Pedagogical Agents on Students' Mathematics Performance: A Comparison Between Two Versions [J].
Bringula, Rex P. ;
Fosgate, Ian Clement O., Jr. ;
Garcia, Neil Peter R. ;
Yorobe, Josf Luinico M. .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL COMPUTING RESEARCH, 2018, 56 (05) :701-722
[10]   Pivotal teaching moments in technology-intensive secondary geometry classrooms [J].
Cayton, Charity ;
Hollebrands, Karen ;
Okumus, Samet ;
Boehm, Ethan .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS TEACHER EDUCATION, 2017, 20 (01) :75-100