Risk prioritization in failure mode and effects analysis under uncertainty

被引:134
作者
Zhang, Zaifang [1 ]
Chu, Xuening [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Mech Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
Failure mode and effects analysis; Fuzzy risk priority numbers; Fuzzy weighted geometric mean; Nonlinear programming model; The method of imprecision; GROUP DECISION-MAKING; ENGINEERING DESIGN; FUZZY; FMEA; QFD;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.06.046
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) is a powerful tool for identifying and assessing potential failures. The tool has become increasingly important in new product development, manufacture or engineering applications. Generally, risk assessment in FMEA is carried out by using risk priority numbers (RPNs) which can be determined by evaluating three factors: occurrence (0), severity (S) and detection (D). Due to the vagueness and uncertainty existing in the evaluating process, crisp numbers representing RPNs in the traditional FMEA might be improper or insufficient in contrast to fuzzy numbers. Currently, the fuzzy methods and linear programming method have been proposed as an effective solution for the calculations of fuzzy RPNs. However, considering the fact that fuzzy RPNs are determined on a multidimensional scale spanning 0, S and D along with their interactions under a fuzzy environment, several gaps should be bridged in the evaluation, calculation, and ranking of fuzzy RPNs. First, decision makers tend to use multi-granularity linguistic term sets for expressing their assessments because of their different backgrounds and preferences. Second, numerical compensation may be existed among 0, S and D that can derive different RPNs in the engineering applications. Third, the complete ranking results for fuzzy RPNs may be easily changed by the effects of uncertain factors. In this study, a fuzzy-RPNs-based method integrating weighted least square method, the method of imprecision and partial ranking method is proposed to generate more accurate fuzzy RPNs and ensure to be robust against the uncertainty. A design example of new horizontal directional drilling machine is used for illustrating the application of the proposed approach. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:206 / 214
页数:9
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   IMPRECISION IN ENGINEERING DESIGN [J].
ANTONSSON, EK ;
OTTO, KN .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 1995, 117 :25-32
[2]  
Ben-Daya M., 1996, International Journal of Quality Reliability Management, V1, P43, DOI DOI 10.1108/02656719610108297
[3]   DELEGATION PROCESS FOR COMBINING INDIVIDUAL UTILITY-FUNCTIONS [J].
BODILY, SE .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1979, 25 (10) :1035-1041
[4]   FUZZY-LOGIC PRIORITIZATION OF FAILURES IN A SYSTEM FAILURE MODE, EFFECTS AND CRITICALITY ANALYSIS [J].
BOWLES, JB ;
PELAEZ, CE .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 1995, 50 (02) :203-213
[5]   Complex system design technique [J].
Brad, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (21) :5979-6008
[6]   Fuzzy TOPSIS approach for failure mode, effects and criticality analysis [J].
Braglia, M ;
Frosolini, M ;
Montanari, R .
QUALITY AND RELIABILITY ENGINEERING INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 19 (05) :425-443
[7]   Group decision making to better respond customer needs in software development [J].
Büyüközkan, G ;
Feyzioglu, O .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2005, 48 (02) :427-441
[8]   An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD processes using fuzzy goal programming models [J].
Chen, LH ;
Weng, MC .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 172 (01) :230-248
[9]   Fuzzy linear programming models for new product design using QFD with FMEA [J].
Chen, Liang-Hsuan ;
Ko, Wen-Chang .
APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2009, 33 (02) :633-647
[10]   A fuzzy QFD program modelling approach using the method of imprecision [J].
Chen, Y. Z. ;
Ngai, E. W. T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2008, 46 (24) :6823-6840