Risk factors and reoperative survival rate of failed narrow-diameter implants in the maxillary anterior region

被引:9
作者
Yang, Guangwen [1 ]
Chen, Li [1 ]
Gao, Ying [2 ]
Liu, Hui [1 ]
Dong, Heng [1 ]
Mou, Yongbin [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Med Sch, Nanjing Stomatol Hosp, Dept Oral Implantol, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] 964 Hosp Peoples Liberat Army, 461 Clin Dept, Jilin, Jilin, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
dental implants; failed risk factors; narrow diameter implants; reimplantation; surface characteristics; survival rate; DENTAL IMPLANTS; RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION; SURFACE CHARACTERISTICS; BONE AUGMENTATION; SITES; FREQUENCY; PERIODONTITIS; METAANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE; PLACEMENT;
D O I
10.1111/cid.12867
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Background Narrow-diameter implants (NDIs) have been proposed to address the dilemma of implant installation in cases of insufficient bone volume. However, the potential risk factors of failed NDIs, and whether reimplants with reliable efficacy are still controversial. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate the survival/success rate of NDIs in the maxillary anterior region and that of reimplants at the same site, as well as to explore the potential risk factors of original and replaced implants. Materials and Methods From January 2015 to April 2019, patients receiving NDIs in the anterior maxilla were enrolled in the present study. Multiple variables were assessed to exploit the risk factor of failed NDIs, including age, sex, implant sites, length, surface characteristics, and healing abutment designs. The relationship between bone augmentation and the number of missing teeth was assessed. For failed NDIs, the reasons for NDIs removal and marginal bone loss (MBL) were analyzed. The details and outcomes of reimplants were evaluated. Results Cumulative survival rates (CSRs) and success rates of 1095 NDIs installed in 835 patients were 96.99% and 96.51%, respectively. In total, 33 of these NDIs failed. TiUnite (TU) surface was a risk factor and it affected the success rate (92.56%) and CSR (92.4%) of NDIs (P < .001). The single NDIs with bone augmentation have lower failure rate. The average MBL for 33 failed NDIs was 1.92 +/- 1.91 mm. Additionally, 22 patients with 23 NDIs accepted reimplantation of previously failed NDIs, and the success rate of reimplants was 95.65%. Conclusions Surface characteristic (TU surface) was a risk factor for failure of NDIs in the maxillary anterior region. Bone augmentation simultaneously performed during NDIs implantation was favorable for a single missing tooth. As an alternative plan, the reimplantation of failed NDIs was reliable and stable after successful bone reconstruction.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 41
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] A 15-YEAR STUDY OF OSSEOINTEGRATED IMPLANTS IN THE TREATMENT OF THE EDENTULOUS JAW
    ADELL, R
    LEKHOLM, U
    ROCKLER, B
    BRANEMARK, PI
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL SURGERY, 1981, 10 (06): : 387 - 416
  • [2] Early bone anchorage to micro- and nano-topographically complex implant surfaces in hyperglycemia
    Ajami, Elnaz
    Bell, Spencer
    Liddell, Robert S.
    Davies, John E.
    [J]. ACTA BIOMATERIALIA, 2016, 39 : 169 - 179
  • [3] Dental Implant Length and Diameter: A Proposed Classification Scheme
    Al-Johany, Sulieman S.
    Al Amri, Mohammad D.
    Alsaeed, Suliman
    Alalola, Bassam
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY, 2017, 26 (03): : 252 - 260
  • [4] Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model
    Al-Nawas, B.
    Groetz, K. A.
    Goetz, H.
    Duschner, H.
    Wagner, W.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2008, 19 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [5] Implant surface characteristics influence the outcome of treatment of peri-implantitis: an experimental study in dogs
    Albouy, Jean-Pierre
    Abrahamsson, Ingemar
    Persson, Leif G.
    Berglundh, Tord
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 2011, 38 (01) : 58 - 64
  • [6] Ali Seyed Asharaf, 2014, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V14, P196, DOI 10.1007/s13191-014-0360-4
  • [7] Alsaadi G, 2006, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V21, P270
  • [8] Evaluation of 316 narrow diameter implants followed for 5-10 years: a clinical and radiographic retrospective study
    Arisan, Volkan
    Bolukbasi, Nilufer
    Ersanli, Selim
    Ozdemir, Tayfun
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (03) : 296 - 307
  • [9] Bakaeen L G, 2001, J Oral Implantol, V27, P63, DOI 10.1563/1548-1336(2001)027<0063:TEOIDR>2.3.CO
  • [10] 2