Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression

被引:167
|
作者
Nguyen Quang Uy [2 ]
Nguyen Xuan Hoai [1 ]
O'Neill, Michael [2 ]
McKay, R. I. [3 ]
Galvan-Lopez, Edgar [2 ]
机构
[1] Le Quy Don Univ, Dept Comp Sci, Hanoi, Vietnam
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Comp Sci & Informat, Complex & Adapt Syst Lab, Dublin, Ireland
[3] Seoul Natl Univ, Sch Comp Sci & Engn, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
Genetic programming; Semantics; Crossover; Symbolic regression locality; REPRESENTATION;
D O I
10.1007/s10710-010-9121-2
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
We investigate the effects of semantically-based crossover operators in genetic programming, applied to real-valued symbolic regression problems. We propose two new relations derived from the semantic distance between subtrees, known as semantic equivalence and semantic similarity. These relations are used to guide variants of the crossover operator, resulting in two new crossover operators-semantics aware crossover (SAC) and semantic similarity-based crossover (SSC). SAC, was introduced and previously studied, is added here for the purpose of comparison and analysis. SSC extends SAC by more closely controlling the semantic distance between subtrees to which crossover may be applied. The new operators were tested on some real-valued symbolic regression problems and compared with standard crossover (SC), context aware crossover (CAC), Soft Brood Selection (SBS), and No Same Mate (NSM) selection. The experimental results show on the problems examined that, with computational effort measured by the number of function node evaluations, only SSC and SBS were significantly better than SC, and SSC was often better than SBS. Further experiments were also conducted to analyse the perfomance sensitivity to the parameter settings for SSC. This analysis leads to a conclusion that SSC is more constructive and has higher locality than SAC, NSM and SC; we believe these are the main reasons for the improved performance of SSC.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 119
页数:29
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Semantically-based crossover in genetic programming: application to real-valued symbolic regression
    Nguyen Quang Uy
    Nguyen Xuan Hoai
    Michael O’Neill
    R. I. McKay
    Edgar Galván-López
    Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines, 2011, 12 : 91 - 119
  • [2] SEMANTICS BASED MUTATION IN GENETIC PROGRAMMING: THE CASE FOR REAL-VALUED SYMBOLIC REGRESSION
    Uy, Nguyen Quang
    Hoai, Nguyen Xuan
    O'Neill, Michael
    MENDELL 2009, 2009, : 73 - 80
  • [3] Semantic Aware Crossover for Genetic Programming: The Case for Real-Valued Function Regression
    Nguyen, Quang Uy
    Nguyen, Xuan Hoai
    O'Neill, Michael
    GENETIC PROGRAMMING, 2009, 5481 : 292 - +
  • [4] Semantically Driven Crossover in Genetic Programming
    Beadle, Lawrence
    Johnson, Colin G.
    2008 IEEE CONGRESS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, VOLS 1-8, 2008, : 111 - 116
  • [5] Semantic Linear Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Huang, Zhixing
    Mei, Yi
    Zhong, Jinghui
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CYBERNETICS, 2024, 54 (02) : 1321 - 1334
  • [6] Semantic schema based genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Zojaji, Zahra
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Nasiri, Hamid
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2022, 122
  • [7] Statistical genetic programming for symbolic regression
    Haeri, Maryam Amir
    Ebadzadeh, Mohammad Mehdi
    Folino, Gianluigi
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2017, 60 : 447 - 469
  • [8] Compositional Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Krawiec, Krzysztof
    Kossinski, Dominik
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 570 - 573
  • [9] Preserving Population Diversity Based on Transformed Semantics in Genetic Programming for Symbolic Regression
    Chen, Qi
    Xue, Bing
    Zhang, Mengjie
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2021, 25 (03) : 433 - 447
  • [10] Denoising Autoencoder Genetic Programming for Real-World Symbolic Regression
    Wittenberg, David
    Rothlauf, Franz
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2022 GENETIC AND EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION CONFERENCE COMPANION, GECCO 2022, 2022, : 612 - 614