Modelling the performance of EPB shield tunnelling using machine and deep learning algorithms

被引:69
作者
Lin, Song-Shun [1 ]
Shen, Shui-Long [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Zhang, Ning [2 ]
Zhou, Annan [3 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Naval Architecture Ocean & Civil Engn, Dept Civil Engn, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
[2] Shantou Univ, Coll Engn, MOE Key Lab Intelligent Mfg Technol, Shantou 515063, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[3] Royal Melbourne Inst Technol RMIT, Sch Engn, Discipline Civil & Infrastruct, Melbourne, Vic 3001, Australia
[4] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Shanghai Key Lab Digital Maintenance Bldg & Infra, Shanghai 200240, Peoples R China
关键词
EPB shield machine; Advancing speed prediction; Intelligent models; Empirical analysis; Tunnel excavation; SUPPORT VECTOR REGRESSION; SHORT-TERM-MEMORY; NEURAL-NETWORK; ADVANCE RATE; PREDICTION; CLASSIFICATION; OPTIMIZATION; OPERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.gsf.2021.101177
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
This paper introduces an intelligent framework for predicting the advancing speed during earth pressure balance (EPB) shield tunnelling. Five artificial intelligence (AI) models based onmachine and deep learning techniques-back-propagation neural network (BPNN), extreme learning machine (ELM), support vector machine (SVM), long-short term memory (LSTM), and gated recurrent unit (GRU)-are used. Five geological and nine operational parameters that influence the advancing speed are considered. A field case of shield tunnelling in Shenzhen City, China is analyzed using the developed models. A total of 1000 field datasets are adopted to establish intelligent models. The prediction performance of the five models is ranked as GRU > LSTM > SVM > ELM > BPNN. Moreover, the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) is adopted for sensitivity analysis. The results reveal that the main thrust (MT), penetration (P), foam volume (FV), and grouting volume (GV) have strong correlations with advancing speed (AS). An empirical formula is constructed based on the high-correlation influential factors and their corresponding field datasets. Finally, the prediction performances of the intelligent models and the empirical method are compared. The results reveal that all the intelligent models perform better than the empirical method. (C) 2021 ChinaUniversity of Geosciences (Beijing) and Peking University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
  • [1] Performance evaluation of normalization-based CBR models for improving construction cost estimation
    Ahn, Joseph
    Ji, Sae-Hyun
    Ahn, Sung Jin
    Park, Moonseo
    Lee, Hyun-Soo
    Kwon, Nahyun
    Lee, Eul-Bum
    Kim, Yonggu
    [J]. AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 119
  • [2] Random forests for global sensitivity analysis: A selective review
    Antoniadis, Anestis
    Lambert-Lacroix, Sophie
    Poggi, Jean-Michel
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 206
  • [3] Cross-validation aggregation for combining autoregressive neural network forecasts
    Barrow, Devon K.
    Crone, Sven F.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2016, 32 (04) : 1120 - 1137
  • [4] Global sensitivity based estimability analysis for the parameter identification of Pitzer's thermodynamic model
    Bouchkira, Ilias
    Latifi, Abderrazak M.
    Khamar, Lhachmi
    Benjelloun, Saad
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2021, 207
  • [5] Experimentally optimal ν in support vector regression for different noise models and parameter settings
    Chalimourda, A
    Schölkopf, B
    Smola, AJ
    [J]. NEURAL NETWORKS, 2004, 17 (01) : 127 - 141
  • [6] Integrating multisensor satellite data merging and image reconstruction in support of machine learning for better water quality management
    Chang, Ni-Bin
    Bai, Kaixu
    Chen, Chi-Farn
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2017, 201 : 227 - 240
  • [7] Chen F.-C., 1990, IEEE Control Systems Magazine, V10, P44, DOI 10.1109/37.55123
  • [8] Comparative analysis of surface water quality prediction performance and identification of key water parameters using different machine learning models based on big data
    Chen, Kangyang
    Chen, Hexia
    Zhou, Chuanlong
    Huang, Yichao
    Qi, Xiangyang
    Shen, Ruqin
    Liu, Fengrui
    Zuo, Min
    Zou, Xinyi
    Wang, Jinfeng
    Zhang, Yan
    Chen, Da
    Chen, Xingguo
    Deng, Yongfeng
    Ren, Hongqiang
    [J]. WATER RESEARCH, 2020, 171 (171)
  • [9] Prediction of shield tunneling-induced ground settlement using machine learning techniques
    Chen, Renpeng
    Zhang, Pin
    Wu, Huaina
    Wang, Zhiteng
    Zhong, Zhiquan
    [J]. FRONTIERS OF STRUCTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING, 2019, 13 (06) : 1363 - 1378
  • [10] Multifactor spatio-temporal correlation model based on a combination of convolutional neural network and long short-term memory neural network for wind speed forecasting
    Chen, Yong
    Zhang, Shuai
    Zhang, Wenyu
    Peng, Juanjuan
    Cai, Yishuai
    [J]. ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2019, 185 : 783 - 799