Improving the Debate: Interface Elements that Enhance Civility and Relevance in Online News Comments

被引:3
作者
Bossens, Emilie [1 ]
Storms, Elias [1 ]
Geerts, David [1 ]
机构
[1] Katholieke Univ Leuven, Meaningful Interact Lab, Mintlab, Leuven, Belgium
来源
HUMAN-COMPUTER INTERACTION, INTERACT 2021, PT IV | 2021年 / 12935卷
关键词
User interfaces; Commenting; Online news; DELIBERATION; INCIVILITY; ANONYMITY; DESIGN; MEDIA; PERCEPTIONS; NEGATIVITY; POLITENESS; DISCOURSE; DEMOCRACY;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-030-85610-6_25
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Online news websites face an increasing amount of hateful reactions of readers, and reactive attempts at enabling more civil discourse, such as moderation, do not prove sufficient. In this study, we propose a proactive approach to counter anti-social behavior by redesigning the comment section's interface. We conducted an exploratory online experiment with 255 participants to determine the impact of including a discussion statement related to the news article's topic in combination with two types of opinion elements. Results reveal a significant positive effect of the novel interfaces on civility and relevance, compared to a traditional comment section (control group). Users evaluated the pragmatic qualities of the traditional comment section significantly more positive compared to the interface with a discussion statement and the continuous opinion element.
引用
收藏
页码:433 / 450
页数:18
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   Nudges for Privacy and Security: Understanding and Assisting Users' Choices Online [J].
Acquisti, Alessandro ;
Adjerid, Idris ;
Balebako, Rebecca ;
Brandimarte, Laura ;
Cranor, Lorrie Faith ;
Komanduri, Saranga ;
Giovanni Leon, Pedro ;
Sadeh, Norman ;
Schaub, Florian ;
Sleeper, Manya ;
Wang, Yang ;
Wilson, Shomir .
ACM COMPUTING SURVEYS, 2017, 50 (03)
[2]   The "Nasty Effect:'' Online Incivility and Risk Perceptions of Emerging Technologies [J].
Anderson, Ashley A. ;
Brossard, Dominique ;
Scheufele, Dietram A. ;
Xenos, Michael A. ;
Ladwig, Peter .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-MEDIATED COMMUNICATION, 2014, 19 (03) :373-387
[3]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[4]   Individual-level differences in negativity biases in news selection [J].
Bachleda, Sarah ;
Neuner, Fabian G. ;
Soroka, Stuart ;
Guggenheim, Lauren ;
Fournier, Patrick ;
Naurin, Elin .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2020, 155
[5]  
Baumeister R. F., 2001, REV GEN PSYCHOL, V5/4, P323, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[6]  
Beckert J, 2020, INT J COMMUN-US, V14, P3924
[7]   Design Considerations for Online Deliberation Systems [J].
Ben Towne, W. ;
Herbsleb, James D. .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2012, 9 (01) :97-115
[8]   The impact of anonymity and issue controversiality on the quality of online discussion [J].
Berg, Janne .
JOURNAL OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY & POLITICS, 2016, 13 (01) :37-51
[9]   THE PARTICIPATORY WEB A user perspective on Web 2.0 [J].
Blank, Grant ;
Reisdorf, Bianca C. .
INFORMATION COMMUNICATION & SOCIETY, 2012, 15 (04) :537-554
[10]  
Br��ckner L., 2017, Studies in Communication Media, V6, P365, DOI [DOI 10.5771/2192-4007-2017-4-365, 10.5771/2192-4007-2017-4-365]