Use of the bougie in simulated difficult intubation. 2. Comparison of single-use bougie with multiple-use bougie

被引：40

作者：

Marfin, AG

Pandit, JJ ^{[1
]}

Hames, KC

Popat, MT

Yentis, SM

机构：

[1] John Radcliffe Hosp, Nuffield Dept Anaesthesia, Oxford OX3 9DU, England

[2] Chelsea & Westminster Hosp, Magill Dept Anaesthet, London, England

来源：

ANAESTHESIA | 2003年 / 58卷 / 09期

关键词：

Intubation; tracheal; difficult; Equipment; multiple-use and single-use tracheal tube introducers;

D O I：

10.1046/j.1365-2044.2003.03289.x

中图分类号：

R614 [麻醉学];

学科分类号：

100217 ;

摘要：

We studied the success rates for tracheal intubation in 32 healthy, anaesthetised patients during simulated grade IIIa laryngoscopy, randomised to either the multiple-use or the single-use bougie. Success rates (primary end-point) and times taken (secondary end-point) to achieve tracheal intubation were recorded. The multiple-use bougie was more successful than the single-use one (15/16 successful intubations vs. 9/16; p=0.03). With either device, median [range] total tracheal intubation times for successful attempts were < 54 [24-84] s and there were no clinically important differences between these times. We conclude that the multiple-use bougie is a more reliable aid to tracheal intubation than the single-use introducer in grade IIIa laryngoscopy.

引用

页码：852 / 855

页数：4