Carbon emissions trading scheme, energy efficiency and rebound effect - Evidence from China's provincial data

被引:160
作者
Chen, Zhe [1 ]
Song, Pei [2 ]
Wang, Baolu [3 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ, Sch Econ, Nanjing 210093, Peoples R China
[2] Nankai Univ, Sch Econ, Tianjin 300073, Peoples R China
[3] Dalian Univ Technol, Sch Management & Econ, Dalian 116023, Peoples R China
关键词
Carbon ETS; Energy efficiency; Technological innovation; Marketization level; Rebound effect; SLACKS-BASED MEASURE; ENVIRONMENTAL-REGULATION; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; CONSUMPTION; PERFORMANCE; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112507
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper uses the carbon emissions trading pilot study of 2013 as a quasi-natural experiment, combined with panel data of 30 provinces and cities in China during 2000-2017, and applies the difference-in-difference (DID) model to investigate the specific impact and mechanism of the carbon emissions trading scheme (ETS) on energy efficiency. The results, which and passed a series of robustness tests, showed that the carbon ETS can significantly improve single-factor energy efficiency and total-factor energy efficiency. The effect mechanism test showed that the carbon ETS can improve energy efficiency by promoting technological innovation of enterprises, and that the marketization level enhanced the carbon ETS's promotion of energy efficiency. Furthermore, this study measures the energy rebound effect at the macro level in China. The results showed that the average energy rebound effect in China is 79.94%. Once the carbon emission trading pilot work was officially launched, the energy rebound effect of the pilot provinces was significantly higher than that of the non-pilot provinces, and the energy conservation effect of the carbon ETS did not function as expected. The research conclusions of this paper provide empirical evidence and policy inspiration for China to improve energy efficiency and accelerate the process of energy conservation.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
[11]   Urban Residential Energy Demand and Rebound Effect in China: A Stochastic Energy Demand Frontier Approach [J].
Du, Kerui ;
Shao, Shuai ;
Yan, Zheming .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2021, 42 (04) :175-193
[12]   Effects of ownership and financial performance on corporate environmental performance [J].
Earnhart, D ;
Lizal, L .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2006, 34 (01) :111-129
[13]  
Fan G., 2010, Neri index of marketization of provinces in china
[14]   A study on evolution of energy intensity in China with heterogeneity and rebound effect [J].
Fan, Ruguo ;
Luo, Ming ;
Zhang, Pengfei .
ENERGY, 2016, 99 :159-169
[15]   Can market oriented economic reforms contribute to energy efficiency improvement? Evidence from China [J].
Fan, Ying ;
Liao, Hua ;
Wei, Yi-Ming .
ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (04) :2287-2295
[16]   AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF AUCTIONS VERSUS GRANDFATHERING TO ASSIGN POLLUTION PERMITS [J].
Goeree, Jacob K. ;
Palmer, Karen ;
Holt, Charles A. ;
Shobe, William ;
Burtraw, Dallas .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC ASSOCIATION, 2010, 8 (2-3) :514-525
[17]   Different types of environmental regulations and heterogeneous influence on energy efficiency in the industrial sector: Evidence from Chinese provincial data [J].
Guo, Ran ;
Yuan, Yijun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2020, 145
[18]   Do increases in energy efficiency improve environmental quality and sustainability? [J].
Hanley, Nick ;
McGregor, Peter G. ;
Swales, J. Kim ;
Turner, Karen .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (03) :692-709
[19]   Would the decoupling of electricity occur along with economic growth? Empirical evidence from the panel data analysis for 100 Chinese cities [J].
Hao, Yu ;
Zhang, Tianli ;
Jing, Leijie ;
Xiao, Linqi .
ENERGY, 2019, 180 :615-625
[20]   Can carbon emission trading scheme achieve energy conservation and emission reduction? Evidence from the industrial sector in China [J].
Hu, Yucai ;
Ren, Shenggang ;
Wang, Yangjie ;
Chen, Xiaohong .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2020, 85