The effects of transfer in teaching vocabulary to school children: An analysis of the dependencies between lists of trained and non-trained words

被引:1
作者
Frost, Jorgen [1 ]
Ottem, Ernst [1 ]
Hagtvet, Bente E. [1 ]
Snow, Catherine E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, Dept Special Needs Educ, POB 1140, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway
[2] Harvard Grad Sch Educ, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
vocabulary training; transfer effects; taught and non-taught word lists; word generation; alternative gain;
D O I
10.1080/00313831.2015.1066435
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In the present study, 81 Norwegian students were taught the meaning of words by the Word Generation (WG) method and 51 Norwegian students were taught by an approach inspired by the Thinking Schools (TS) concept. Two sets of words were used: a set of words to be trained and a set of non-trained control words. The two teaching methods yielded no significant differences for the trained words, but the WG participants performed better than the TS participants on the non-trained words. An analysis of the dependencies between the trained words and non-trained words suggested that the participants of the WG program, in contrast to the TS students, profited from a transfer effect that resulted in augmented scores on the non-trained words.
引用
收藏
页码:709 / 722
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Anderson R.C., 1981, COMPREHENSION TEACHI, P77, DOI DOI 10.4236/PSYCH.2012.31007
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, BRIT PICTURE VOCABUL
[3]  
[Anonymous], HABITS OF MIND
[4]  
Apthorp H., 2011, SREE 2011 UNPUB
[5]  
ARBUCKLE JL, 1999, AMOS 4 USERS GUIDE
[6]  
Bakhtin Mikhail, 1990, DIALOGIC IMAGINATION
[7]  
Barron R.F., 1973, RES READING CONTENT, P46
[8]  
Beck I., 1991, Handbook of reading research, V2, P789
[9]   EFFECTS OF LONG-TERM VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION ON LEXICAL ACCESS AND READING-COMPREHENSION [J].
BECK, IL ;
PERFETTI, CA ;
MCKEOWN, MG .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 74 (04) :506-521
[10]   An effective method for building meaning vocabulary in primary grades [J].
Biemiller, A ;
Boote, C .
JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 98 (01) :44-62