Functional variants in cell death pathway genes and risk of pancreatic cancer

被引:82
作者
Yang, Ming [1 ]
Sun, Tong [1 ]
Wang, Li [2 ]
Yu, Dianke [1 ]
Zhang, Xumei [1 ]
Miao, Xiaoping [1 ]
Liu, Junniao [1 ]
Zhao, Dan
Li, Hui [2 ,3 ]
Tan, Wen [1 ]
Lin, Dongxin [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Etiol & Carcinogenesis, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Inst Basic Med Sci, Dept Epidemiol, Beijing 100037, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Union Med Coll, Beijing 100021, Peoples R China
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-0177
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Fas-Fas ligand (FasL)-mediated death pathway is important in the life and death of immune cells and, therefore, influences immune surveillance of carcinogenesis. This study examined the association between functional variants of Fas (-1377G -> A and -670A -> G), FasL (-844T -> C), and caspase-8 (CASP8) six-nucleoticle deletion polymorphism (-652 6N ins -> Ael) and risk of pancreatic cancer. Experimental Design: Genotypes were determined in 397 cases with pancreatic cancer and 907 controls. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) were estimated by logistic regression, and all statistical tests were two sided. Results: We found a significant decrease in risk of pancreatic cancer associated with FasL and CASP8 but not Fas polymorphisms. Compared with noncarriers, the ORs of developing pancreatic cancer for FasL -844CT and TT carriers were 0.73 (95% CI, 0.57-0.94) and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.19-0.63), and for CASP8 -652 6N ins/del and del/del carriers were 0.65 (95% CI, 0.50-0.85) and 0.56 (95% CI, 0.33-0.98), respectively. Gene-gene interaction between the FasL and CASP8 variants further reduced the cancer risk in a multiplicative manner (OR for the presence of both FasL -844TT and CASP8 -652 6N del/del genotype, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.75). On the other hand, a multiplicative joint effect between the FasL -844CC or CASP8 -652 6N ins/ins genotype and smoking or diabetes mellitus in intensifying risk of pancreatic cancer was also evident. Conclusions: These results suggest that genetic variations in the death pathway genes FasL and CASP8 are involved in susceptibility to developing pancreatic cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:3230 / 3236
页数:7
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Signalling pathways of the TNF superfamily: A double-edged sword
    Aggarwal, BB
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS IMMUNOLOGY, 2003, 3 (09) : 745 - 756
  • [2] Transgenic expression of dominant-negative fas-associated death domain protein in β cells protects against fas ligand-induced apoptosis and reduces spontaneous diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice
    Allison, J
    Thomas, HE
    Catterall, T
    Kay, TWH
    Strasser, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGY, 2005, 175 (01) : 293 - 301
  • [3] Effects of smoking on activation markers, Fas expression and apoptosis of peripheral blood lymphocytes
    Bijl, M
    Horst, G
    Limburg, PC
    Kallenberg, CGM
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION, 2001, 31 (06) : 550 - 553
  • [4] Gene-environment interaction and aetiology of cancer: what does it mean and how can we measure it?
    Brennan, P
    [J]. CARCINOGENESIS, 2002, 23 (03) : 381 - 387
  • [5] T cell-tumor cell: a fatal interaction?
    Chappell, DB
    Restifo, NP
    [J]. CANCER IMMUNOLOGY IMMUNOTHERAPY, 1998, 47 (02) : 65 - 71
  • [6] Probability of pancreatic cancer following diabetes: A population-based study
    Chari, ST
    Leibson, CL
    Rabe, KG
    Ransom, J
    De Andrade, M
    Petersen, GM
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2005, 129 (02) : 504 - 511
  • [7] Diabetes mellitus as a predictor of cancer mortality in a large cohort of US adults
    Coughlin, SS
    Calle, EE
    Teras, LR
    Petrelli, J
    Thun, MJ
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 159 (12) : 1160 - 1167
  • [8] Gene expression profiles of pancreatic cancer and stromal desmoplasia
    Crnogorac-Jurcevic, T
    Efthimiou, E
    Capelli, P
    Blaveri, E
    Baron, A
    Terris, B
    Jones, M
    Tyson, K
    Bassi, C
    Scarpa, A
    Lemoine, NR
    [J]. ONCOGENE, 2001, 20 (50) : 7437 - 7446
  • [9] Elnemr A, 2001, INT J ONCOL, V18, P33
  • [10] Geng YM, 1996, J IMMUNOL, V156, P2384