Canadian consumer acceptance of gene-edited versus genetically modified potatoes: A choice experiment approach

被引:71
作者
Muringai, Violet [1 ]
Fan, Xiaoli [1 ]
Goddard, Ellen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, 515 Gen Serv Bldg, Edmonton, AB T6G 2H1, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D AGROECONOMIE | 2020年 / 68卷 / 01期
关键词
choice experiment; consumer acceptance; gene editing; genetically modified; potato; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; MODIFIED FOOD; PUBLIC ACCEPTANCE; LOW-ACRYLAMIDE; GM FOODS; INFORMATION; BIOTECHNOLOGY; PREFERENCES; BENEFITS; CRISPR;
D O I
10.1111/cjag.12221
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
In 2016, second-generation genetically modified (GM) potatoes were approved for production and sale in Canada. In this study, we analyze how consumer acceptance of GM potatoes may be affected by various factors, including the trait introduced (i.e., the product benefits), the type of breeding technology used, and the developer of the potato using any technology. We conduct an online survey and use a stated choice experiment to collect data on consumer acceptance of GM and other potatoes in Canada. Random utility models are used to analyze the economic value consumers place on the various attributes of the potatoes. Our results show that consumers are willing to pay more for a health attribute (reduced acrylamide produced when potatoes are fried) and an environmental attribute. Respondents in general need to face discounted prices to buy potatoes created by either gene editing or GM (either transgenic or cisgenic/intragenic) technologies. However, consumers are in general more accepting of the gene editing technology than the GM technologies. Our results also show that government is the most preferred developer of the potatoes, regardless of technology. Results from this study can help guide public and private management of the introduction of new foods when the products are developed with unpopular technologies.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 63
页数:17
相关论文
共 72 条
[31]  
Holmes TP, 2017, ECON NON-MARK GOOD, V13, P133, DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-7104-8_5
[32]   A proposed regulatory framework for genome-edited crops [J].
Huang, Sanwen ;
Weigel, Detlef ;
Beachy, Roger N. ;
Li, Jiayang .
NATURE GENETICS, 2016, 48 (02) :109-111
[33]  
International Potato Center, 2019, POTATO
[34]   Consumer acceptance of food crops developed by genome editing [J].
Ishii, Tetsuya ;
Araki, Motoko .
PLANT CELL REPORTS, 2016, 35 (07) :1507-1518
[35]   Consumer preferences for GM food and other attributes of the food system [J].
James, S ;
Burton, M .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2003, 47 (04) :501-518
[36]   RESPONDENT SCREENING AND REVEALED PREFERENCE AXIOMS TESTING QUARANTINING METHODS FOR ENHANCED DATA QUALITY IN WEB PANEL SURVEYS [J].
Jones, Michael S. ;
House, Lisa A. ;
Gao, Zhifeng .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2015, 79 (03) :687-709
[37]  
Kanter J. E. U., 2012, NY TIMES
[38]  
Kilman S. S. R. of T. W. S., 2000, WALL STREET J
[39]  
Lacy K, 2016, J AGR RESOUR ECON, V41, P116
[40]   Brand avoidance, genetic modification, and brandlessness [J].
Lee, Michael Shyue Wai ;
Conroy, Denise ;
Motion, Judith .
AUSTRALASIAN MARKETING JOURNAL, 2012, 20 (04) :297-302