Single-institute experience, management, success rate, and outcome after external cephalic version at term

被引:21
作者
Bogner, Gerhard [1 ]
Xu, Fang [1 ]
Simbrunner, Christian [1 ]
Bacherer, Alfred [1 ]
Reisenberger, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Klinikum Kreuzschwestern Wels, Dept Obstet & Gynecol 1, Wels, Austria
关键词
Breech presentation; Delivery; Fetal; Obstetric; Pregnancy outcome; Version; PLANNED VAGINAL BIRTH; BREECH PRESENTATION; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.09.027
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine obstetric outcomes after external cephalic version (ECV) performed at term. Methods: In a retrospective study of ECV among pregnant women at term at Klinikum Kreuzschwestern Wels between January 1999 and June 2010, univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to analyze factors influencing success rate. Results: Among 379 ECV attempts, 49.1% (95% confidence interval, 44.1-54.1) were successful. Success rate was dependent on parity, gestational age, and performing physician. Increasing parity was associated with increasing success rate (P=0.05). Gestational age had no influence until week 39, after which the success rate increased (success after completion of week 35, 48.1%; week 37, 43.7%; week 38, 43.5%; week 39, 64.9%; week 40 or more, 90.9%; P=0.19). The performing physician had a significant influence (P<0.0005). Regarding obstetric outcome, spontaneous re-version occurred in 8.1% of women, 81.1% of women delivered vaginally, 7.9% had unplanned cesarean delivery, and 4.9% had vacuum extraction. No harm to fetal or maternal health resulted from ECV. Conclusion: ECV was found to be a safe procedure at term. The skill of the physician significantly affected the success rate. The rate of surgical delivery after successful ECV was low. A trial of ECV at term and beyond is feasible. Crown Copyright (C) 2011 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. on behalf of International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:134 / 137
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]   Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version [J].
Ben-Meir, Assaf ;
Erez, Yair ;
Sela, Hen Yitzhak ;
Shveiky, David ;
Tsafrir, Avi ;
Ezra, Yossef .
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2008, 21 (09) :660-662
[4]  
Birth Registry of Austria, 2009, THESIS DANUBE U KREM
[5]   Fetomaternal hemorrhage during external cephalic version [J].
Boucher, Marc ;
Marquette, Gerald P. ;
Varin, Jocelyne ;
Champagne, Josette ;
Bujold, Emmanuel .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2008, 112 (01) :79-84
[6]   A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term [J].
Burgos, Jorge ;
Carlos Melchor, Juan ;
Ignacio Pijoan, Jose ;
Cobos, Patricia ;
Fernandez-Llebrez, Luis ;
Martinez-Astorquiza, Txanton .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2011, 112 (01) :48-51
[7]   Cesarean and Vaginal Birth in Canadian Women: A Comparison of Experiences [J].
Chalmers, Beverley ;
Kaczorowski, Janusz ;
Darling, Elizabeth ;
Heaman, Maureen ;
Fell, Deshayne B. ;
O'Brien, Beverley ;
Lee, Lily .
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE, 2010, 37 (01) :44-49
[8]   Cesarean risk after successful external cephalic version: a matched, retrospective analysis [J].
Clock, C. ;
Kurtzman, J. ;
White, J. ;
Chung, J. H. .
JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2009, 29 (02) :96-100
[9]   External cephalic version: a safe procedure? A systematic review of version-related risks [J].
Collaris, RJ ;
Oei, SG .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 83 (06) :511-518
[10]  
Comm Obstetric Practice, 2002, INT J GYNECOL OBSTET, V77, P65