Evaluating FDG uptake changes between pre and post therapy respiratory gated PET scans

被引:18
作者
Aristophanous, Michalis [1 ]
Yong, Yue [1 ]
Yap, Jeffrey T. [2 ,3 ]
Killoran, Joseph H. [1 ]
Allen, Aaron M. [1 ]
Berbeco, Ross I. [1 ]
Chen, Aileen B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Dana Farber Brigham & Womens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiat Oncol, Boston, MA USA
[2] Dana Farber Brigham & Womens Canc Ctr, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
4D PET/CT; Therapy response; Biological target volume; Lung cancer; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; F-18-FDG PET; IMAGES; CT; RADIOTHERAPY; CRITERIA; LESIONS; CANCER; RECIST; MOTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.radonc.2011.12.015
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Whole body (3D) and respiratory gated (4D) FDG-PET/CT scans performed pre-radiotherapy (pre-RT) and post-radiotherapy (post-RT) were analyzed to investigate the impact of 4D PET in evaluating 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake changes due to therapy, relative to traditional 3D PET. Methods and materials: 3D and 4D sequential FDG-PET/CT scans were acquired pre-RT and approximately one month post-RT for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The lesions of high uptake targeted with radiotherapy were identified on the pre-RT scan of each patient. Each lesion on the 3D and each of the five phases of the 4D scan were analyzed using a region of interest (ROI). For each patient the ROIs of the pre-RT scans were used to locate the areas of initial FDG uptake on the post-RT scans following rigid registration. Post-RT ROIs were drawn and the FDG uptake was compared with that of the pre-RT scans. Results: Sixteen distinct lesions from 12 patients were identified and analyzed. Standardized uptake value (SUV) maxima were significantly higher (p-value <0.005) for the lesions as measured on the 4D compared to 3D PET. Comparison of serial pre and post-RT scans showed a mean 62% decrease in SUV with the 3D PET scan (range 36-89%), and a 67% decrease with the 4D PET scan (range 30-89%). The mean absolute difference in SUV change on 3D versus 4D scans was 4.9%, with a range 0-15% (p-value = 0.07). Conclusions: Signal recovery with 4D PET results in higher SUVs when compared to standard 3D PET. Consequently, differences in the evaluation of SUV changes between pre and post-RT plans were observed. Such difference can have a significant impact in PET-based response assessment. (c) 2012 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. Radiotherapy and Oncology 102 (2012) 377-382
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 382
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Is pre-therapeutical FDG-PET/CT capable to detect high risk tumor subvolumes responsible for local failure in non-small cell lung cancer? [J].
Abramyuk, Andrij ;
Tokalov, Sergey ;
Zoephel, Klaus ;
Koch, Arne ;
Lazanyi, Kornelia Szluha ;
Gillham, Charles ;
Herrmann, Thomas ;
Abolmaali, Nasreddin .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2009, 91 (03) :399-404
[2]  
Aristophanous M, 2012, INT J RADIAT ONCOL, V82, P99
[3]   FOUR-DIMENSIONAL POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY: IMPLICATIONS FOR DOSE PAINTING OF HIGH-UPTAKE REGIONS [J].
Aristophanous, Michalis ;
Yap, Jeffrey T. ;
Killoran, Joseph H. ;
Chen, Aileen B. ;
Berbeco, Ross I. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 80 (03) :900-908
[4]   Detection and compensation of organ/lesion motion using 4D-PET/CT respiratory gated acquisition techniques [J].
Bettinardi, Valentino ;
Picchio, Maria ;
Di Muzio, Nadia ;
Gianolli, Luigi ;
Gilardi, Maria Carla ;
Messa, Cristina .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2010, 96 (03) :311-316
[5]   Repeat FDG-PET after neoadjuvant therapy is a predictor of pathologic response in patients with non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Bryant, AS ;
Winokur, TS ;
Ohja, B ;
Bartolucci, AA .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2004, 78 (06) :1903-1909
[6]   The role of FDG-PET scan in staging patients with nonsmall cell carcinoma [J].
Cerfolio, RJ ;
Ojha, B ;
Bryant, AS ;
Bass, CS ;
Bartalucci, AA ;
Mountz, JM .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2003, 76 (03) :861-866
[7]   Predictive and prognostic value of FDG-PET in nonsmall-cell lung cancer - A systematic review [J].
de Geus-Oei, Lioe-Fee ;
van der Heijden, Henricus F. M. ;
Corstens, Frans H. M. ;
Oyen, Wirn J. G. .
CANCER, 2007, 110 (08) :1654-1664
[8]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[9]   18F-FDG PET for assessment of therapy response and preoperative re-evaluation after neoadjuvant radio-chemotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer [J].
Eschmann, Susanne Martina ;
Friedel, Godehard ;
Paulsen, Frank ;
Reimold, Matthias ;
Hehr, Thomas ;
Budach, Wilfried ;
Langen, Heinz-Jakob ;
Bares, Roland .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2007, 34 (04) :463-471
[10]   18F-FDG PET-CT respiratory gating in characterization of pulmonary lesions: approximation towards clinical indications [J].
Garcia Vicente, A. M. ;
Soriano Castrejon, A. M. ;
Talavera Rubio, M. P. ;
Leon Martin, A. A. ;
Palomar Munoz, A. M. ;
Pilkington Woll, J. P. ;
Poblete Garcia, V. M. .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2010, 24 (03) :207-214