Taking a Bad Turn: Compromised DNA Damage Response in Leukemia

被引:16
作者
Nilles, Nadine [1 ]
Fahrenkrog, Birthe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Inst Mol Biol & Med, B-6041 Charleroi, Belgium
关键词
DNA damage response; leukemia; double-strand break repair; non-homologous end joining; homologous recombination; CHRONIC LYMPHOCYTIC-LEUKEMIA; STRAND-BREAK REPAIR; FANCONI-ANEMIA PATHWAY; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; END RESECTION; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; INDUCED APOPTOSIS; TUMOR-SUPPRESSOR; BRCA1; EXPRESSION; IDH2; MUTATIONS;
D O I
10.3390/cells6020011
中图分类号
Q2 [细胞生物学];
学科分类号
071009 ; 090102 ;
摘要
Genomic integrity is of outmost importance for the survival at the cellular and the organismal level and key to human health. To ensure the integrity of their DNA, cells have evolved maintenance programs collectively known as the DNA damage response. Particularly challenging for genome integrity are DNA double-strand breaks (DSB) and defects in their repair are often associated with human disease, including leukemia. Defective DSB repair may not only be disease-causing, but further contribute to poor treatment outcome and poor prognosis in leukemia. Here, we review current insight into altered DSB repair mechanisms identified in leukemia. While DSB repair is somewhat compromised in all leukemic subtypes, certain key players of DSB repair are particularly targeted: DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PK) and Ku70/80 in the non-homologous end-joining pathway, as well as Rad51 and breast cancer 1/2 (BRCA1/2), key players in homologous recombination. Defects in leukemia-related DSB repair may not only arise from dysfunctional repair components, but also indirectly from mutations in key regulators of gene expression and/or chromatin structure, such as p53, the Kirsten ras oncogene (K-RAS), and isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 and 2 (IDH1/2). A detailed understanding of the basis for defective DNA damage response (DDR) mechanisms for each leukemia subtype may allow to further develop new treatment methods to improve treatment outcome and prognosis for patients.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Histone ubiquitination in the DNA damage response [J].
Uckelmann, Michael ;
Sixma, Titia K. .
DNA REPAIR, 2017, 56 :92-101
[42]   Histone modifications in DNA damage response [J].
Cao, Lin-Lin ;
Shen, Changchun ;
Zhu, Wei-Guo .
SCIENCE CHINA-LIFE SCIENCES, 2016, 59 (03) :257-270
[43]   Histone methylation and the DNA damage response [J].
Gong, Fade ;
Miller, Kyle M. .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2019, 780 :37-47
[44]   Chromosome Dynamics in Response to DNA Damage [J].
Seeber, Andrew ;
Hauer, Michael H. ;
Gasser, Susan M. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENETICS, VOL 52, 2018, 52 :295-319
[45]   APC/CCdh1 controls CtIP stability during the cell cycle and in response to DNA damage [J].
Lafranchi, Lorenzo ;
de Boer, Harmen R. ;
de Vries, Elisabeth G. E. ;
Ong, Shao-En ;
Sartori, Alessandro A. ;
van Vugt, Marcel A. T. M. .
EMBO JOURNAL, 2014, 33 (23) :2860-2879
[46]   DNA damage response and cancer therapeutics through the lens of the Fanconi Anemia DNA repair pathway [J].
Bhattacharjee, Sonali ;
Nandi, Saikat .
CELL COMMUNICATION AND SIGNALING, 2017, 15
[47]   For Better orWorse: Modulation of the Host DNA Damage Response by Human Papillomavirus [J].
Studstill, Caleb J. ;
Moody, Cary A. .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF VIROLOGY, 2023, 10 :325-345
[48]   The MORC family New epigenetic regulators of transcription and DNA damage response [J].
Li, Da-Qiang ;
Nair, Sujit S. ;
Kumar, Rakesh .
EPIGENETICS, 2013, 8 (07) :685-693
[49]   Cadmium disrupts the DNA damage response by destabilizing RNF168 [J].
Zhang, Shuyuan ;
Hao, Shuailin ;
Qiu, Zhiyu ;
Wang, Ya ;
Zhao, Yuqin ;
Li, Youhang ;
Gao, Wen ;
Wu, Yan ;
Liu, Chang ;
Xu, Xingzhi ;
Wang, Hailong .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 2019, 133
[50]   Deregulated estrogen receptor signaling and DNA damage response in breast tumorigenesis [J].
Rajan, Arathi ;
Nadhan, Revathy ;
Latha, Neetha Rajan ;
Krishnan, Neethu ;
Warrier, Arathy, V ;
Srinivas, Priya .
BIOCHIMICA ET BIOPHYSICA ACTA-REVIEWS ON CANCER, 2021, 1875 (01)