Product development as reading and writing doings within sociotechnical practices: the reciprocity between engineers and artefacts

被引:3
作者
Mathiasen, John Bang [1 ]
Koch, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Dept Business & Technol, Sch Business & Social Sci, Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Chalmers Univ Technol, Construct Management, S-41296 Gothenburg, Sweden
关键词
reciprocity; product development; reading and writing doings; Dewey; TECHNOLOGY;
D O I
10.1080/09537325.2015.1019848
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This ethnographic study aims at understanding how product development of wind turbine controls unfolds as ongoing engineer-artefact reciprocity. We adopt a Deweyan constructionist and Science-Technology-Society approach to contribute to product development and sociomaterial studies by emphasising the role of reciprocity between engineers' experience and artefacts through reading and writing doings. Reading doings involve texts such as specifications, minutes, sketches and components. Writing doings create/modify the same type of texts. In one project, convergent reciprocity enabled the development. Another project's development was blocked, restarted and completed internally at the producer. Enablers included repositioning of working practices, application of various artefacts/tools, heterogeneous engineers and creation of common ground. Constraints involved lack of openness, too malleable artefacts, no common ground and radical change of the development trajectory. The engineers' learning depends on these constraints and enablers. Three types of reciprocity occur: convergent, faded away and blocked.
引用
收藏
页码:604 / 620
页数:17
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   How is technology made?-That is the question! [J].
Bijker, Wiebe E. .
CAMBRIDGE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2010, 34 (01) :63-76
[2]  
Bucciarelli L. L., 1994, DESIGNING ENG
[3]  
Bucciarelli Louis L., 2002, Design Studies, V23, P219, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X(01)00035-7, 10.1016/S0142-694X, DOI 10.1016/S0142-694X]
[4]  
Carlile PaulR., 2013, How Matter Matters: Objects, Artifacts, and Materiality in Organization Studies, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199671533.001.0001, 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199671533.003.0001]
[5]   Transferring, translating, and transforming: An integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries [J].
Carlile, PR .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2004, 15 (05) :555-568
[6]  
Crotty M., 2012, The foundations of social research. Meaning and perspective in the research process
[7]  
Dewey J, 1933, THE LATER WORKS, V8
[8]  
DEWEY John, 1938, THE LATER WORKS, V12
[9]   Organizational learning - The 'third way' [J].
Elkjaer, B .
MANAGEMENT LEARNING, 2004, 35 (04) :419-434
[10]   Design tools and framing practices [J].
Friedrich Glock .
Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), 2003, 12 (2) :221-239