I Just Want My Research Credit: Frequency of Suboptimal Effort in a Non-Clinical Healthy Undergraduate Sample

被引:70
作者
DeRight, Jonathan [1 ]
Jorgensen, Randall S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Syracuse Univ, Dept Psychol, Syracuse, NY USA
关键词
Performance validity testing; Effort testing; College students; SYMPTOM VALIDITY TEST; CNS VITAL SIGNS; TEST-PERFORMANCE; BRAIN-DAMAGE; TEST BATTERY; IMPACT; TESTS; PARTICIPANTS; CONCUSSION; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1080/13854046.2014.989267
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
Although performance validity testing is becoming fairly routine in clinical settings, research protocols involving neuropsychological tests infrequently include assessments of performance validity. The current study utilized an embedded measure of effort over two administrations of CNS Vital Signs to determine the frequency of poor effort in non-clinical healthy undergraduate students participating in a research study for course credit. Results indicate that more than 1 in 10 college students participating in a cognitive test battery for research showed test scores consistent with inadequate effort, which was associated with poor performance on testing across many domains. This conclusion was supported by poor performance on many other subtests. Healthy college students with suboptimal effort (n = 11) had an overall score in the 15th percentile on average compared to the 48th percentile in the rest of the students (n = 66). Those who failed validity indicators on the baseline administration were more likely to fail validity indicators on the repeat administration. Those who were tested in the morning were also more likely to fail validity indicators. The current study provides evidence for the potential limitations of conducting research using neuropsychological tests with healthy college student volunteers in the absence of performance validity testing. Revised college-level cutoffs are proposed.
引用
收藏
页码:101 / 117
页数:17
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Conducting Research with Non-clinical Healthy Undergraduates: Does Effort Play a Role in Neuropsychological Test Performance? [J].
An, Kelly Y. ;
Zakzanis, Konstantine K. ;
Joordens, Steve .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (08) :849-857
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Halsted-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: theory and clinical interpretation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IMPACT VERSION 2 0 C
[4]   Comparison of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Effort Index and Stand-Alone Symptom Validity Tests in a Military Sample [J].
Armistead-Jehle, Patrick ;
Hansen, Christopher L. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 26 (07) :592-601
[5]   Neuropsychological testing of high school athletes - Preliminary norms and test-retest indices [J].
Barr, WB .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2003, 18 (01) :91-101
[6]   An examination of the california verbal learning test II to detect incomplete effort in a traumatic brain-injury sample [J].
Bauer, L ;
Yantz, CL ;
Ryan, LM ;
Warden, DL ;
McCaffrey, RJ .
APPLIED NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 12 (04) :202-207
[7]  
Boone K.B., 2002, The Dot Counting Test manual
[8]   Embedded Validity Indicators on CNS Vital Signs in Youth with Neurological Diagnoses [J].
Brooks, Brian L. ;
Sherman, Elisabeth M. S. ;
Iverson, Grant L. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2014, 29 (05) :422-431
[9]   Victoria Symptom Validity Test Performance in Children and Adolescents with Neurological Disorders [J].
Brooks, Brian L. .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 27 (08) :858-868
[10]   Symptom validity assessment:: Practice issues and medical necessity -: NAN policy & planning committee [J].
Bush, SS ;
Ruff, RM ;
Tröster, AI ;
Barth, JT ;
Koffler, SP ;
Pliskin, NH ;
Reynolds, CR ;
Silver, CH .
ARCHIVES OF CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 20 (04) :419-426