Accounting matters: Revisiting claims of decoupling and genuine green growth in Nordic countries

被引:34
作者
Tilsted, Joachim Peter [1 ]
Bjorn, Anders [2 ]
Majeau-Bettez, Guillaume [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Lund, Jens Friis [6 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Technol & Soc, Environm & Energy Syst Studies, Box 118, SE-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Concordia Univ, John Molson Sch Business, Dept Management, 1450 Guy, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] Polytech Montreal QC, CIRAIG, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] Polytech Montreal QC, Dept Chem Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol NTNU, Ind Ecol Program, Trondheim, Norway
[6] Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
Green growth; Carbon accounting; Indicators; Nordics; Ecological modernisation; Environmental governance; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CARBON; CENTRALITY; EMISSIONS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.107101
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Ecological modernisation in the form of support to the notion of green growth remains the dominant discourse in environmental policy globally. Still, questions of limits to economic expansion and growth on a planet with finite natural resources have been at the core of environmental discourses at least since the 1970's. A recent effort by Stoknes and Rockstro center dot m (2018) seeks to unite notions of ecological limits with the concept of green growth by proposing genuine green growth as denoting a situation when growth respects planetary boundaries. Focusing on recent trajectories in emissions intensity, they highlight Nordic countries including Denmark as examples of such genuine green growth. In this article, we demonstrate that the specific conceptualization of genuine green growth and resulting claims about the Nordic countries rest on particular assumptions, specifically concerning national level carbon accounting frameworks and the size of the remaining global carbon budget. By opening up these assumptions for analysis we illustrate the partiality and potentially misleading nature of the conceptualization of GGG.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]   Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations [J].
Aichele, Rahel ;
Felbermayr, Gabriel .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2012, 63 (03) :336-354
[2]   A factor of two: how the mitigation plans of 'climate progressive' nations fall far short of Paris-compliant pathways [J].
Anderson, Kevin ;
Broderick, John F. ;
Stoddard, Isak .
CLIMATE POLICY, 2020, 20 (10) :1290-1304
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, EU Action Plan on Human Rights and Democracy (2015-2019), DOI DOI 10.29019/ENFOQUEUTE.786
[4]   Pathways to climate-neutral shipping: A Danish case study [J].
ben Brahim, Till ;
Wiese, Frauke ;
Munster, Marie .
ENERGY, 2019, 188
[5]  
Berndes G., 2020, USE FOREST BIOMASS C
[6]   From the Paris Agreement to corporate climate commitments: evaluation of seven methods for setting 'science-based' emission targets [J].
Bjorn, Anders ;
Lloyd, Shannon ;
Matthews, Damon .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (05)
[8]  
Brand U., 2012, ECOL PERSPECT SCI SO, V21, P5
[9]  
Christoff P., 1996, ENVIRON POLIT, V5, P476, DOI DOI 10.1080/09644019608414283
[10]   Defining and predicting sustainability [J].
Costanza, R ;
Patten, BC .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 1995, 15 (03) :193-196