What Do Patients Want from Otolaryngologists? A Discrete Choice Experiment

被引:13
作者
Naunheim, Matthew R. [1 ,2 ]
Rathi, Vinay K. [1 ,2 ]
Naunheim, Margaret L. [3 ]
Alkire, Blake C. [1 ,2 ]
Lam, Allen C. [1 ,2 ]
Song, Phillip C. [1 ,2 ]
Shrime, Mark G. [1 ,2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Massachusetts Eye & Ear Infirm, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, 243 Charles St, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[2] Harvard Med Sch, Dept Otol & Laryngol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] Harvard Med Sch, Program Global Surg & Social Change, Boston, MA USA
关键词
patient preferences; willingness to pay; stated preference methods; conjoint analysis; discrete choice experiment; health care delivery; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; COST-BENEFIT-ANALYSIS; ALLERGIC RHINITIS; TASK-FORCE; CARE; PREFERENCES; ATTRIBUTES;
D O I
10.1177/0194599817717662
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Objectives. Patient preferences are crucial for the delivery of patient-centered care. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are an emerging quantitative methodology used for understanding these preferences. In this study, we employed DCE techniques to understand the preferences of patients presenting for an ear, nose, and throat clinic visit. Study Design. DCE. Setting. Decision science laboratory. Methods. A DCE survey of 5 attributes-wait time, physician experience, physician personality, utilization of visit time, and cost/copayment-was constructed with structured qualitative interviews with patients. The DCE was administered to participants from the general population, who chose among hypothetical scenarios that varied across these attributes. A conditional logit model was used to determine relative attribute importance, with a separate logit model for determining subject effects. Results. A total of 161 participants were included. Cost/copayment had the greatest impact on decision making (importance, 32.2%), followed by wait time and physician experience (26.5% and 24.7%, respectively). Physician personality mattered least (4.7%), although all attributes were significantly correlated to decision making. Participants preferred doctors who spent more time performing physical examination than listening or explaining. Participants were willing to pay $52 extra to avoid a 4-week delay in appointment time; $87 extra for a physician with 10 years of experience (vs 0 years); and $9 extra for a caring, friendly, and compassionate doctor (vs formal, efficient, and business-like). Conclusion. DCEs allow for powerful economic analyses that may help physicians understand patient preferences. Our model showed that cost is an important factor to patients and that patients are willing to pay extra for timely appointments, experience, and thorough physical examination.
引用
收藏
页码:618 / 624
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, USING DISCRETE CHOIC
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2001, SHAP FUT CROSS QUAL
  • [3] Bridges J., 2007, ISPOR Connect, V13, P4
  • [4] Bridges John F P, 2003, Appl Health Econ Health Policy, V2, P213
  • [5] Consumer Preferences for Hearing Aid Attributes: A Comparison of Rating and Conjoint Analysis Methods
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Lataille, Angela T.
    Buttorff, Christine
    White, Sharon
    Niparko, John K.
    [J]. TRENDS IN AMPLIFICATION, 2012, 16 (01): : 40 - 48
  • [6] Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force
    Bridges, John F. P.
    Hauber, A. Brett
    Marshall, Deborah
    Lloyd, Andrew
    Prosser, Lisa A.
    Regier, Dean A.
    Johnson, F. Reed
    Mauskopf, Josephine
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) : 403 - 413
  • [7] What patients want from primary care consultations: A discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities
    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh
    Hole, Arne Risa
    Mead, Nicola
    McDonald, Ruth
    Whalley, Diane
    Bower, Peter
    Roland, Martin
    [J]. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2008, 6 (02) : 107 - 115
  • [8] Mapping Clinical Outcomes Expectations to Treatment Decisions: An Application to Vestibular Schwannoma Management
    Cheung, Steven W.
    Aranda, Derick
    Driscoll, Colin L. W.
    Parsa, Andrew T.
    [J]. OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2010, 31 (02) : 284 - 293
  • [9] Preferences for aspects of a dermatology consultation
    Coast, J.
    Salisbury, C.
    de Berker, D.
    Noble, A.
    Horrocks, S.
    Peters, T. J.
    Flynn, T. N.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY, 2006, 155 (02) : 387 - 392
  • [10] Self-referred patients at the Emergency Department: patient characteristics, motivations, and willingness to make a copayment
    de Valk J.
    Taal E.M.
    Nijhoff M.S.
    Harms M.H.
    Lieshout E.M.M.
    Patka P.
    Rood P.P.M.
    [J]. International Journal of Emergency Medicine, 2014, 7 (1)