Scientometric analysis of medical publications during COVID-19 pandemic: the twenty-twenty research boom

被引:15
作者
Aggarwal, Ankita [1 ]
Agosti, Edoardo [2 ]
Singh, Preet M. [3 ]
Varshini, Amrutha [4 ]
Garg, Kanwaljeet [5 ]
Chaurasia, Bipin [6 ]
Zanin, Luca [2 ]
Fontanella, Marco M. [2 ]
机构
[1] VMMC & Safdarjung Hosp, Dept Radiodiag, New Delhi, India
[2] Univ Brescia, Unit Neurosurg, Dept Surg Specialties Radiol Sci & Publ & Iealth, Brescia, Italy
[3] Washington Univ, Dept Anesthesiol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
[4] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Surg Disciplines, New Delhi, India
[5] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Neurosurg, New Delhi 110029, India
[6] Gandak Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Birgunj, Nepal
关键词
COVID-19; Bibliometrics; Coronavirus; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.23736/S0026-4806.21.07489-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
INTRODUCTION: There was significant surge in the academic publications after the onset of COVID-19 outbreak. The aim of this study was to scientometrically analyze all the medical publications on COVID-19 in 2020 as well as the top 100 cited articles. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a search of the "Web of Science" database using the keywords "COVID," and "corona" on December 20, 2020. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Our search retrieved a total of 45,420 articles on the topic COVID-19 in the year 2020. Corresponding authors from 143 countries contributed to these articles. The highest number of articles were contributed by corresponding authors from the USA (N.=10299), whereas 50 articles in the top 100 cited articles had corresponding authors from China. Among the top 100 cited, the majority were published from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in China (N.=37). New England Journal of Medicine had the maximum impact (h-index of 57), closely followed by Lancet (h-index=55). CONCLUSIONS: Scientific publications amount on COVID-19 disease grew at an astonishing pace during 2020. We caution the readers that this rapidity of publication could have missed out on the rigorous review process and the scientific basis of the methods followed.
引用
收藏
页码:631 / 640
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Looking for Landmarks: The Role of Expert Review and Bibliometric Analysis in Evaluating Scientific Publication Outputs [J].
Allen, Liz ;
Jones, Ceri ;
Dolby, Kevin ;
Lynn, David ;
Walport, Mark .
PLOS ONE, 2009, 4 (06)
[2]   COVID-19: endgames [J].
不详 .
LANCET INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2020, 20 (05) :511-511
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2020, R: the R project for statistical computing
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PLOS ONE, V15
[5]   Trauma network during COVID-19: perspective from the four designed major trauma centers in north-west Italy [J].
Aprato, Alessandro ;
Bini, Nahalie ;
Casiraghi, Alessandro ;
Mezzadri, Umberto ;
Mazzacane, Michael ;
Galante, Claudio ;
Biancardi, Elena ;
Milano, Giuseppe ;
Capitani, Dario ;
D'angelo, Fabio ;
Masse, Alessandro .
MINERVA ORTOPEDICA E TRAUMATOLOGICA, 2020, 71 (04) :139-143
[6]   bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis [J].
Aria, Massimo ;
Cuccurullo, Corrado .
JOURNAL OF INFORMETRICS, 2017, 11 (04) :959-975
[7]   A Bibliometric Analysis of COVID-19 across Science and Social Science Research Landscape [J].
Aristovnik, Aleksander ;
Ravselj, Dejan ;
Umek, Lan .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (21) :1-30
[8]   Management of surgical working in an Italian neighborhood hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic [J].
Bagnoli, Pietro F. ;
Nehchiri, Farhad ;
Lucini, Monica ;
Messina, Maria E. ;
Morlacchi, Andrea ;
Lenna, Giovanni ;
Ferrante, Pasquale .
MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2020, 75 (06) :462-465
[9]   Lessons from the Italian COVID-19 frontline [J].
Bellan, Mattia ;
Sainaghi, Pier Paolo ;
Gavelli, Francesco ;
Patrucco, Filippo ;
Avanzi, Gian Carlo ;
Pirisi, Mario ;
Castello, Luigi M. .
MINERVA MEDICA, 2020, 111 (04) :303-305
[10]   Workflow management for COVID-19 patients needing an urgent neurosurgical procedure [J].
Boeris, Davide ;
Falco, Jacopo ;
Potenza, Arcangela ;
Colistra, Davide ;
Bagnoli, Enrico ;
Cenzato, Marco .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGICAL SCIENCES, 2020, 64 (04) :407-409