Economic Model Predictive Control of Nonlinear Process Systems Using Empirical Models

被引:59
作者
Alanqar, Anas [1 ]
Ellis, Matthew [1 ]
Christofides, Panagiotis D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Chem & Biomol Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Elect Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
economic model predictive control; system identification; process control; process optimization; process economics; chemical processes; IDENTIFICATION; PERFORMANCE; ALGORITHMS; STABILITY; TIME;
D O I
10.1002/aic.14683
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Economic model predictive control (EMPC) is a feedback control technique that attempts to tightly integrate economic optimization and feedback control since it is a predictive control scheme that is formulated with an objective function representing the process economics. As its name implies, EMPC requires the availability of a dynamic model to compute its control actions and such a model may be obtained either through application of first principles or through system identification techniques. In industrial practice, it may be difficult in general to obtain an accurate first-principles model of the process. Motivated by this, in the present work, Lyapunov-based EMPC (LEMPC) is designed with a linear empirical model that allows for closed-loop stability guarantees in the context of nonlinear chemical processes. Specifically, when the linear model provides a sufficient degree of accuracy in the region where time varying economically optimal operation is considered, conditions for closed-loop stability under the LEMPC scheme based on the empirical model are derived. The LEMPC scheme is applied to a chemical process example to demonstrate its closed-loop stability and performance properties as well as significant computational advantages. (c) 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 816-830, 2015
引用
收藏
页码:816 / 830
页数:15
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Modelling and identification of non-linear deterministic systems in the delta-domain [J].
Anderson, S. R. ;
Kadirkamanathan, V. .
AUTOMATICA, 2007, 43 (11) :1859-1868
[2]   On Average Performance and Stability of Economic Model Predictive Control [J].
Angeli, David ;
Amrit, Rishi ;
Rawlings, James B. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2012, 57 (07) :1615-1626
[3]   SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION - SURVEY [J].
ASTROM, KJ ;
EYKHOFF, P .
AUTOMATICA, 1971, 7 (02) :123-+
[4]   Integrating data-based modeling and nonlinear control tools for batch process control [J].
Aumi, Siam ;
Mhaskar, Prashant .
AICHE JOURNAL, 2012, 58 (07) :2105-2119
[5]  
Billings SA, 2013, NONLINEAR SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION: NARMAX METHODS IN THE TIME, FREQUENCY, AND SPATIO-TEMPORAL DOMAINS, P1, DOI 10.1002/9781118535561
[6]   Model-based predictive control for Hammerstein-Wiener systems [J].
Bloemen, HHJ ;
van den Boom, TJJ ;
Verbruggen, HB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2001, 74 (05) :482-495
[7]   Subspace algorithms for the identification of multivariable dynamic errors-in-variables models [J].
Chou, CT ;
Verhaegen, M .
AUTOMATICA, 1997, 33 (10) :1857-1869
[8]  
Christofides P., 2005, CONTROL NONLINEAR HY
[9]  
Doyle F.J., 2002, COMM CONT E
[10]   Bounded robust control of constrained multivariable nonlinear processes [J].
El-Farra, NH ;
Christofides, PD .
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING SCIENCE, 2003, 58 (13) :3025-3047