Costs of treatment for elderly women with advanced ovarian cancer in a Medicare population

被引:14
作者
Forde, G. K. [1 ]
Chang, J. [2 ]
Ziogas, A. [2 ]
Tewari, K. [1 ]
Bristow, R. E. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Irvine Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Gynecol Oncol, Orange, CA 92668 USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Epidemiol, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
Ovarian cancer; SEER-Medicare; Cost-effectiveness; Surgery; Chemotherapy; Cost; ADVANCED-STAGE OVARIAN; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; COMORBIDITY INDEX; SURVIVAL; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2015.03.050
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objective. To analyze the cost of treating women with advanced stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) undergoing primary debulking surgery (PDS) or neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NAD). Methods. The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare database (1992 to 2009) was used to evaluate the 7-month cost of care following PDS and NACT for advanced EOC. Multivariate analyses were used to evaluate differences between women treated by PDS and NACT on cost and survival. Results. Of the 4506 women eligible for analysis, 82.4% underwent PDS and 17.6% received NACT. Eighty-five percent with stage IIIC and 78.5% with stage IV EOC underwent PDS (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in the median cost of care between PDS and NACT existed in women with stage IIIC EOC ($59,801 vs. $59,905). There was a 12% increase in adjusted cost of care for stage IV patients ($63,131 vs. $55,302) who received PDS (p < 0.0001). Increasing Charlson score was associated with an increase in 7-month cost of care in both stages. NACT was associated with a decreased 5-year overall survival in women with stage IIIC EOC (HR = 1.27, 95% CI: 1.10-1.47) and stage IV EOC (HR = 1.19,95% Cl: 1.03-1.37) compared to PDS. Conclusion. NACT and PDS are comparable in cost for women with stage IIIC EOC, and PDS is minimally more expensive for women with stage IV EOC. PDS was associated with an increase 5-year overall survival. Future investigations should include cost-effectiveness analyses where additional measures such as quality adjusted life years and propensity scored survival are included. (C) 2015 Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:479 / 484
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], BUR LAB STAT CONS PR
  • [2] Evolution of surgical treatment paradigms for advanced-stage ovarian cancer: Redefining 'optimal' residual disease
    Chang, Suk-Joon
    Bristow, Robert E.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 125 (02) : 483 - 492
  • [3] A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION
    CHARLSON, ME
    POMPEI, P
    ALES, KL
    MACKENZIE, CR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05): : 373 - 383
  • [4] Chi DS, 2012, J CLIN ONCOL, V30, P1563, DOI 10.1200/JCO.2011.41.1744
  • [5] An analysis of patients with bulky advanced stage ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal carcinoma treated with primary debulking surgery (PDS) during an identical time period as the randomized EORTC-NCIC trial of PDS vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT)
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Musa, Fernanda
    Dao, Fanny
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Leitao, Mario M.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Gardner, Ginger J.
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Barakat, Richard R.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2012, 124 (01) : 10 - 14
  • [6] Is the Easier Way Ever the Better Way?
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Armstrong, Deborah K.
    Karlan, Beth Y.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (31) : 4073 - 4075
  • [7] Improved progression-free and overall survival in advanced ovarian cancer as a result of a change in surgical paradigm
    Chi, Dennis S.
    Eisenhauer, Eric L.
    Zivanovic, Oliver
    Sonoda, Yukio
    Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
    Levine, Douglas A.
    Guile, Matthew W.
    Bristow, Robert E.
    Aghajanian, Carol
    Barakat, Richard R.
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 114 (01) : 26 - 31
  • [8] ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES
    DEYO, RA
    CHERKIN, DC
    CIOL, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) : 613 - 619
  • [9] Which is the better surgical strategy for newly diagnosed epithelial ovarian cancer: primary or interval debulking?
    Hoskins, Paul J.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN ONCOLOGY, 2011, 23 (05) : 501 - 506
  • [10] THE EFFECT OF DIAMETER OF LARGEST RESIDUAL DISEASE ON SURVIVAL AFTER PRIMARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH SUBOPTIMAL RESIDUAL EPITHELIAL OVARIAN-CARCINOMA
    HOSKINS, WJ
    MCGUIRE, WP
    BRADY, MF
    HOMESLEY, HD
    CREASMAN, WT
    BERMAN, M
    BALL, H
    BEREK, JS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 170 (04) : 974 - 980