Validation of the Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument in different study settings: findings from The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Survey Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS)

被引:35
作者
Lutomski, J. E. [1 ,2 ]
van Exel, N. J. A. [3 ]
Kempen, G. I. J. M. [4 ]
van Charante, E. P. Moll [5 ]
den Elzen, W. P. J. [6 ]
Jansen, A. P. D. [7 ]
Krabbe, P. F. M. [8 ]
Steunenberg, B. [9 ]
Steyerberg, E. W. [10 ]
Rikkert, M. G. M. Olde [1 ]
Melis, R. J. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Geriatr Med, Postbus 9101, NL-6500 HB Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Natl Univ Ireland Univ Coll Cork, Anu Res Ctr, Cork, Ireland
[3] Erasmus Univ, Inst Hlth Policy & Management, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI Sch Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Dept Hlth Serv Res, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Amsterdam, Acad Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med & Geriatr, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[6] Leiden Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[7] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Care Med, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[8] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Epidemiol, Groningen, Netherlands
[9] UMC Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Utrecht, Netherlands
[10] Erasmus MC Univ Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
CarerQol-7D; Caregivers; Quality of life; Geriatric health services; Visual analogue scale; BURDEN; FAMILY; IMPACT; BIAS;
D O I
10.1007/s11136-014-0841-2
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Validity is a contextual aspect of a scale which may differ across sample populations and study protocols. The objective of our study was to validate the Care-Related Quality of Life Instrument (CarerQol) across two different study design features, sampling framework (general population vs. different care settings) and survey mode (interview vs. written questionnaire). Methods: Data were extracted from The Older Persons and Informal Caregivers Minimum DataSet (TOPICS-MDS, (www.topics-mds.eu), a pooled public-access data set with information on > 3,000 informal caregivers throughout the Netherlands. Meta-correlations and linear mixed models between the CarerQol's seven dimensions (CarerQol-7D) and caregiver's level of happiness (CarerQol-VAS) and self-rated burden (SRB) were performed. Results: The CarerQol-7D dimensions were correlated to the CarerQol-VAS and SRB in the pooled data set and the subgroups. The strength of correlations between CarerQol-7D dimensions and SRB was weaker among caregivers who were interviewed versus those who completed a written questionnaire. The directionality of associations between the CarerQol-VAS, SRB and the CarerQol-7D dimensions in the multivariate model supported the construct validity of the CarerQol in the pooled population. Significant interaction terms were observed in several dimensions of the CarerQol-7D across sampling frame and survey mode, suggesting meaningful differences in reporting levels. Conclusions: Although good scientific practice emphasises the importance of re-evaluating instrument properties in individual research studies, our findings support the validity and applicability of the CarerQol instrument in a variety of settings. Due to minor differential reporting, pooling CarerQol data collected using mixed administration modes should be interpreted with caution; for TOPICS-MDS, meta-analytic techniques may be warranted.
引用
收藏
页码:1281 / 1293
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
Agree Emily., 2009, International Handbook of Population Aging, P647, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3, DOI 10.1007/978-1-4020-8356-3_29]
[2]   Assessment of publication bias, selection bias, and unavailable data in meta-analyses using individual participant data: a database survey [J].
Ahmed, Ikhlaaq ;
Sutton, Alexander J. ;
Riley, Richard D. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2012, 344
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2002, NEW VIEW STAT EFFECT
[4]  
[Anonymous], META META ANALYSIS W
[5]   Caregiving Burden, Stress, and Health Effects Among Family Caregivers of Adult Cancer Patients [J].
Bevans, Margaret ;
Sternberg, Esther M. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (04) :398-403
[6]   Health Effects in Significant Others: Separating Family and Care-Giving Effects [J].
Bobinac, Ana ;
van Exel, N. Job A. ;
Rutten, Frans F. H. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2011, 31 (02) :292-298
[7]   Caring for and caring about: Disentangling the caregiver effect and the family effect [J].
Bobinac, Ana ;
van Exel, N. Job A. ;
Rutten, Frans F. H. ;
Brouwer, Werner B. F. .
JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS, 2010, 29 (04) :549-556
[8]   Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data [J].
Boulton, Geoffrey ;
Rawlins, Michael ;
Vallance, Patrick ;
Walport, Mark .
LANCET, 2011, 377 (9778) :1633-1635
[9]   The CarerQol instrument: A new instrument to measure care-related quality of life of informal caregivers for use in economic evaluations [J].
Brouwer, W. B. F. ;
van Exel, N. J. A. ;
van Gorp, B. ;
Redekop, W. K. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2006, 15 (06) :1005-1021
[10]   Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring [J].
Brouwer, WBF ;
van Exel, NJA ;
van den Berg, B ;
van den Bos, GAM ;
Koopmanschap, MA .
HEALTH POLICY, 2005, 74 (01) :85-99