Performance indicators for lifecycle process of public private partnership (PPP) projects in Malaysia

被引:12
作者
Ismail, Suhaiza [1 ]
Mohamad, Rosnani [2 ]
Said, Julia Mohd [1 ]
机构
[1] Int Islamic Univ Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Jabatan Akauntan Negara, Putrajaya, Malaysia
关键词
Performance indicators; Process lifecycle; Public private partnership; Malaysia; CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS; FINANCE INITIATIVE PFI; MONEY; IMPLEMENTATION; OBJECTIVES; SELECTION; DRIVERS; CLIENTS;
D O I
10.1108/BEPAM-02-2021-0030
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Purpose This paper has two objectives. The first objective is to examine the important performance indicators of the lifecycle process of public private partnership (PPP) projects. The second objective is to investigate the difference in the perception of the importance of the performance indicators between the public and private sectors. Design/methodology/approach To achieve the research objectives, the study used a questionnaire survey. The questionnaire was distributed via postal mail to officers of government departments and private sector companies who may have been involved in PPP projects. A total of 237 completed questionnaires were received, representing a 51.52% response rate. To examine the importance of performance indicators, the descriptive statistical tests of mean, standard deviation and mean score ranking were used. Independent t-tests were conducted to investigate the differences in the perceptions of the importance of performance indicators between the two respondent groups. Findings The findings show that all the 16 performance indicators are perceived as important and very important. The top five important performance indicators for a PPP project lifecycle process are "Time management", "Contractual management", "Cost management", "Safety management" and "Effective risk management system", while "stress or conflicts management" is the least important. In terms of the differences in the perception of the public and private sector groups, the results indicate that four indicators ("environment protection", "cost management", "effective risk management system" and "good work environment"), show a significant statistical difference between the perception of the public and the private sector respondents. Originality/value This study offers empirical evidence on key performance indicators for a PPP project that are crucial throughout its lifecycle as perceived by two key parties in a PPP contract, i.e. the public and the private sectors.
引用
收藏
页码:704 / 718
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Abdul Aziz A.R., 2010, 4 NAPREC C ORG INSPE
[2]  
Ahmad H., 2017, ASIA-PAC J BUS ADM, V9, P146
[3]  
Akintoye A., 2003, Construction Management and Economics, V21, P461, DOI DOI 10.1080/0144619032000087285
[4]  
Almarri K, 2017, BUILT ENVIRON PROJ A, V7, P546, DOI 10.1108/BEPAM-05-2017-0031
[5]  
Asenova D., 2010, Crit. Perspect. Account, V21, P1, DOI [10.1016/j.cpa.2008.09.009, DOI 10.1016/J.CPA.2008.09.009]
[6]  
Auditor General's Report, 2012, AKTIVITI KEMENTERIAN
[7]  
Chan AP, 2004, Benchmarking: an international journal, V11, P203, DOI DOI 10.1108/14635770410532624
[8]  
Chowdhury A.N., 2017, I EC, V2, P64
[9]  
Cooper D.R., 2011, BUSINESS RES METHODS, V11th
[10]  
Cruz C.O, 2019, J MODERN PROJECT MAN, V7, P64