Evaluating the Structure of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) Survey from the Patient's Perspective

被引:25
作者
Fan, Jiaquan [1 ]
McCoy, Rozalina G. [2 ]
Ziegenfuss, Jeanette Y. [3 ]
Smith, Steven A. [1 ,2 ]
Borah, Bijan J. [1 ]
Deming, James R. [4 ]
Montori, Victor M. [2 ]
Shah, Nilay D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Hlth Care Policy & Res, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Endocrinol, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] HealthPartners Inst Educ & Res, Bloomington, MN USA
[4] Mayo Clin, Hlth Syst Franciscan Healthcare, Dept Family Med, Tomah, WI USA
关键词
Chronic care model; PACIC; Factorial validity; Patient-reported outcomes; Patient-centered care; Quality assessment; NONRESPONSE; QUALITY; VERSION; RATES;
D O I
10.1007/s12160-014-9638-3
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) survey is a widely used instrument to assess the patient experience with healthcare delivery. This study aims to evaluate the factorial structure of PACIC from the patient perspective. A postal survey was mailed to 4,796 randomly selected adults with diabetes from 34 primary care clinics. Internal consistencies of PACIC subscales were assessed by Cronhach's alpha. Factorial structure was evaluated by confirmatory and exploratory factor analyses. Based on responses of 2,055 patients (43 % response rate), exploratory factor analysis discerned a 4-factor, not 5-factor, model dominated by patient evaluation of healthcare services (explaining 74 % of the variance). The other 3 factors addressed patient involvement (goal setting, participating in the healthcare team) and social support for self-management. The underlying factorial structure of PACIC, which reflects the patient perspective, is dynamic, patient-centered, and differs from the original 5-factor model that was more aligned with views of healthcare delivery stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:104 / 111
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Chronic Diseases: Chronic Diseases and Development 5 Monitoring and surveillance of chronic non-communicable diseases: progress and capacity in high-burden countries [J].
Alwan, Ala ;
MacLean, David R. ;
Riley, Leanne M. ;
d'Espaignet, Edouard Tursan ;
Mathers, Colin Douglas ;
Stevens, Gretchen Anna ;
Bettcher, Douglas .
LANCET, 2010, 376 (9755) :1861-1868
[2]  
Aragones Abraham, 2008, Prev Chronic Dis, V5, pA113
[3]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[4]   Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (ACIC): A practical tool to measure quality improvement [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Wagner, EH ;
Glasgow, RE ;
VonKorff, M .
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2002, 37 (03) :791-820
[5]   Factorial validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) and PACIC short version (PACIC-S) among cardiovascular disease patients in the Netherlands [J].
Cramm, Jane Murray ;
Nieboer, Anna Petra .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2012, 10
[6]   Changes in telephone survey nonresponse over the past quarter century [J].
Curtin, R ;
Presser, S ;
Singer, E .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2005, 69 (01) :87-98
[7]  
Drewes Hanneke W, 2012, Int J Integr Care, V12, pe194
[8]   Use of the Patient Assessment of Chronic Illness Care (PACIC) with diabetic patients - Relationship to patient characteristics, receipt of care, and self-management [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Whitesides, H ;
Nelson, CC ;
King, DK .
DIABETES CARE, 2005, 28 (11) :2655-2661
[9]   Development and validation of the patient assessment of chronic illness care (PACIC) [J].
Glasgow, RE ;
Wagner, EH ;
Schaefer, J ;
Mahoney, LD ;
Reid, RJ ;
Greene, SA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (05) :436-444
[10]  
Goetz Katja, 2012, Am J Manag Care, V18, pe55