3D seismic assessment of historical stone arch bridges considering effects of normal-shear directions of stiffness parameters between discrete stone elements

被引:6
作者
Cavuslu, Murat [1 ]
机构
[1] Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Zonguldak, Turkey
关键词
burger-creep material model; historical stone arch bridge; interaction condition; seismic analysis; stiffness parameter; MASONRY; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.12989/sem.2022.83.2.207
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
In general, the interaction conditions between the discrete stones are not taken into account by structural engineers during the modeling and analyzing of historical stone bridges. However, many structural damages in the stone bridges occur due to ignoring the interaction conditions between discrete stones. In this study, it is aimed to examine the seismic behavior of a historical stone bridge by considering the interaction stiffness parameters between stone elements. For this purpose, Tokatli historical stone arch bridge was built in 1179 in Karab??k-Turkey, is chosen for three-dimensional (3D) seismic analyses. Firstly, the 3D finite-difference model of the Tokatli stone bridge is created using the FLAC3D software. During the modeling processes, the Burger-Creep material model which was not used to examine the seismic behavior of historical stone bridges in the past is utilized. Furthermore, the free-field and quiet non-reflecting boundary conditions are defined to the lateral and bottom boundaries of the bridge. Thanks to these boundary conditions, earthquake waves do not reflect in the 3D model. After each stone element is modeled separately, stiffness elements are defined between the stone elements. Three situations of the stiffness elements are considered in the seismic analyses; a) for only normal direction b) for only shear direction c) for both normal and shear directions. The earthquake analyses of the bridge are performed for these three different situations of the bridge. The far-fault and near-fault conditions of 1989 Loma Prieta earthquake are taken into account during the earthquake analyses. According to the seismic analysis results, the directions of the stiffness parameters seriously changed the earthquake behavior of the Tokatli bridge. Moreover, the most critical stiffness parameter is determined for seismic analyses of historical stone arch bridges.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 227
页数:21
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2022, Google Earth
[2]   The finite element analysis of collapse loads of single-spanned historic masonry arch bridges (Ordu, Sarpdere Bridge) [J].
Aydin, Abdulkadir Cuneyt ;
Ozkaya, Suat Gokhan .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2018, 84 :131-138
[3]   Determination of free vibration properties of masonry arch bridges using the dynamic stiffness method [J].
Bozyigit, Baran ;
Acikgoz, Sinan .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2022, 250
[4]   Structural performance of renovated masonry low bridge in Amasya, Turkey [J].
Cakir, Ferit ;
Seker, Burcin S. .
EARTHQUAKES AND STRUCTURES, 2015, 8 (06) :1387-1406
[5]   Parameter identification for damaged condition investigation on masonry arch bridges using a Bayesian approach [J].
Conde, B. ;
Eguia, P. ;
Stavroulakis, G. E. ;
Granada, E. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 172 :275-284
[6]   Inverse analysis of masonry arch bridges for damaged condition investigation: Application on Kakodiki bridge [J].
Conde, B. ;
Drosopoulos, G. A. ;
Stavroulakis, G. E. ;
Riveiro, B. ;
Stavroulaki, M. E. .
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2016, 127 :388-401
[7]   Detailed FE and DE modelling of stone masonry arch bridges for the assessment of load-carrying capacity [J].
Costa, C. ;
Arede, A. ;
Morais, M. ;
Anibal, A. .
ICSI 2015 THE 1ST INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY FUNCHAL, 2015, 114 :854-861
[8]   Modeling Strategies for the Computational Analysis of Unreinforced Masonry Structures: Review and Classification [J].
D'Altri, Antonio Maria ;
Sarhosis, Vasilis ;
Milani, Gabriele ;
Rots, Jan ;
Cattari, Serena ;
Lagomarsino, Sergio ;
Sacco, Elio ;
Tralli, Antonio ;
Castellazzi, Giovanni ;
de Miranda, Stefano .
ARCHIVES OF COMPUTATIONAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2020, 27 (04) :1153-1185
[9]   A probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the Turkish territory: part II-fault source and background seismicity model [J].
Demircioglu, Mine Betul ;
Sesetyan, Karin ;
Duman, Tamer Y. ;
Can, Tolga ;
Tekin, Senem ;
Ergintav, Semih .
BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2018, 16 (08) :3399-3438
[10]   Failure of structural (RC, masonry, bridge) to Van earthquake [J].
Dogan, Mizam .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2013, 35 :489-498