Intrathecal ropivacaine or bupivacaine with fentanyl for labour

被引:25
作者
Hughes, D
Hill, D [1 ]
Fee, JPH
机构
[1] Ulster Hosp, Dept Anaesthet, Belfast BT16 1RH, Antrim, North Ireland
[2] Queens Univ Belfast, Dept Anaesthesia, Belfast, Antrim, North Ireland
关键词
analgesia; obstetric; anaesthetic techniques; combined spinal-epidural; anaesthetics local; bupivacaine; ropivacaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/87.5.733
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) is widely used to provide pain relief in labour while minimizing motor blockade. Aiming to further reduce associated motor weakness, we compared ropivacaine 2.5 mg in the intrathecal injection with a standard bupivacaine CSE in a double-blind study. Forty women were randomized to receive either bupivacaine 2.5 mg or ropivacaine 2.5 mg intrathecally, both with fentanyl 0.025 mg. There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the onset, duration or quality of analgesia or the level of sensory block attained. Forty per cent of the women (8/20) receiving bupivacaine developed detectable motor block compared with only 5% (1/20) in the ropivacaine group (P<0.05). Vibration sense was impaired in one woman in each group. Adverse effects did not differ between groups. We conclude that intrathecal ropivacaine 2.5 mg in combination with fentanyl 0.025 mg as part of a CSE technique provides rapid and safe analgesia for labour as effective as that achieved with bupivacaine 2.5 mg and with significantly less motor block.
引用
收藏
页码:733 / 737
页数:5
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[2]   POSTERIOR COLUMN SENSORY IMPAIRMENT DURING AMBULATORY EXTRADURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
BUGGY, D ;
HUGHES, N ;
GARDINER, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (04) :540-542
[3]   THE ADDITION OF BUPIVACAINE TO INTRATHECAL SUFENTANIL FOR LABOR ANALGESIA [J].
CAMPBELL, DC ;
CAMANN, WR ;
DATTA, S .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :305-309
[4]  
Collis R E, 1994, Int J Obstet Anesth, V3, P75, DOI 10.1016/0959-289X(94)90173-2
[5]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL AND STANDARD EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
COLLIS, RE ;
DAVIES, DWL ;
AVELING, W .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8962) :1413-1416
[6]   Comparison of low-dose epidural with combined spinal-epidural analgesia for labour [J].
Dresner, M ;
Bamber, J ;
Calow, C ;
Freeman, J ;
Charlton, P .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1999, 83 (05) :756-760
[7]   Intrathecal alfentanil with and without bupivacaine for analgesia in labour [J].
Hughes, DA ;
Hill, DA .
ANAESTHESIA, 2000, 55 (11) :1116-1121
[8]   Intrathecal ropivacaine for labor anagesia: A comparison with bupivacaine [J].
Levin, A ;
Datta, S ;
Camann, WR .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1998, 87 (03) :624-627
[9]   Hyperbaric spinal ropivacaine - A comparison to bupivacaine in volunteers [J].
McDonald, SB ;
Liu, SS ;
Kopacz, DJ ;
Stephenson, CA .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1999, 90 (04) :971-977
[10]   BUPIVACAINE VERSUS BUPIVACAINE PLUS FENTANYL FOR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA - EFFECT ON MATERNAL SATISFACTION [J].
MURPHY, JD ;
HENDERSON, K ;
BOWDEN, MI ;
LEWIS, M ;
COOPER, GM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1991, 302 (6776) :564-567